Dismissed¶30

Hirendra Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC23 Apr 2026WPC/3357/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; WPC No. 3357 of 2021; decided 24/04/2026 by Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi, J.; writ petition dismissed as infructuous; challenge to show-cause notice dated 26.07.2021 (Annexure P-1) issued by SDO (Revenue), Gariaband in Revenue Case No. 202010220300067/A-Year 2019-20; revenue case attained finality, final order dated 01.08.2023 (Annexure R/1) cancelled diversion order of S.D.O. (R), Gariaband; Article 226 Constitution of India; Gariyaband revenue/diversion matter; State of Chhattisgarh respondents.

What did the court decide?

Since the show-cause notice was issued at the initial stage of the revenue case, which has now attained finality with the diversion order cancelled, the writ petition has become infructuous. ¶29

Hirendra Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Writ and Judicial Review | Chhattisgarh HC (2026)

2026:CGHC:19095

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPC No. 3357 of 2021

¶6

Hirendra Sahu S/o Late Manmohan Sahu Aged About 30 Years Resident Of Tiranga Chowk , Gariyaband, Tehsil And District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

versus

¶9

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary , Ministry Of Revenue, Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex , Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶10

2 - The Collector District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh.

¶11

3 - The Upper Collector Gariyaband.

¶12

4 - The Sub Divisional Officer (R) District Gariyaband.

¶13

5 - The Tehsildar Gariyaband , District Gariyaband.

¶14

6 - The Naib Tehsildar Gariyaband , District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh.

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

(Cause title, as taken from CIS}

¶17

For Petitioner	: Mr. Sameer Uraon, Advocate.
For Respondents	: Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Govt. Advocate with Mr. Arpit Agrawal, Panel Lawyer.

¶18

{Hon’ble Mr. Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)

Order on Board

24/04/2026

1. Heard.

2. Instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been

¶23

preferred by the petitioner challenging the show cause Notice dated 26.07.2021

¶24

¶25

(Annexure P-1) issued by Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Gariaband, District - Gariaband (C.G.) in Revenue Case No. 202010220300067/A-Year 2019-20.

¶26

3. Learned counsel for the State has filed its reply.

¶27

4. Learned counsel for the State while referring to its reply submits that aforesaid revenue case has now attained its finality and vide order dated 01.08.2023 (Annexure R/1) diversion order dated 02.12.2023 passed by S.D.O. (Revenue), Gariaband has been cancelled, therefore, this petition has become infructuous.

¶28

5. Aforesaid facts has also been conceded by counsel for the petitioner.

¶29

6. Having considered the contention putforth by counsel for the parties, particularly considering the reply filed by the State, since show-cause notice (Annexure P-1) dated 26.07.2021 has been issued at the initial stage of aforesaid revenue case and as of now, revenue case has attained its finality and final order has been passed on 01.08.2023 by Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Gariaband and diversion order dated 02.12.2020 passed by S.D.O. (R) (Gariaband) has been cancelled. Therefore, in aforesaid situation, this petition has become infructuous.

¶30

7. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

¶31

Sd/-

¶32

(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge

¶33

AMITKUMARDUBEY Digitally signedby AMITKUMAR DUBEYDate:2026.04.2813:05:58 +0530

Hirendra Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hirendra Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sandhya Patel Vs Union of India

Manav Rachna Education Society Vs Union of India

Smt. Neetilika Sharma Vs Rituraj Raghuvanshi

Rahul Deo Shukla Vs Smt. Sushila Bai (Died) through Lrs-

Lt. Col. Vijay Bahadur Thapa Vs Union of India

Tejram Vs State of Chhattisgarh