Daman Kumar Luniya v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Chhattisgarh High Court Bilaspur; WPC No. 3114 of 2020; Daman Kumar Luniya v. State of Chhattisgarh and others; dismissal for want of prosecution; non-appearance of petitioner/counsel on two calls; no representation made; Panchayat and Rural Development Department; Commissioner Bilaspur Division; Collector (Fisheries Department) Mungeli; CEO Zila Panchayat Mungeli; CEO Janpad Panchayat Lormi; Gram Panchayat Navrangpur; Sarpanch Rekhadevi Luniya; Up-Sarpanch Vishnu Prasad Luniya; Tahsil Lormi, District Mungeli; single-judge order by Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J.; order dated 15/04/2026; no merits decided, no relief granted.
What did the court decide?
Since no one appeared for the petitioner when the matter was called and even in the second call, the Court had no other option except to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. ¶25