Smt. Ayate Madkami v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Infructuous writ petition dismissed: Ayate Madkami, Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Pordem (Sukma) v. State of Chhattisgarh (Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development), Collector Sukma and Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Sukma; WPC No. 2361 of 2022; decided 06/05/2026 by Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad (single judge); counsel: Praveen K Dhurandhar for petitioner, Soumitra Kesharwani PL for State/respondents; dismissal on joint submission of infructuousness; no relief granted, no quantum, no statutory provisions or precedents engaged with.
What did the court decide?
On the joint submission of learned counsel for both parties that the Writ Petition had become infructuous, the Court dismissed the Writ Petition as having become infructuous. ¶18