Dismissed¶23

Umarkot Wale Baba Seva Samiti v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC2 Jul 2026WPC/233/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for want of prosecution (non-prosecution) by High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, WPC No. 233 of 2023, decided 03.07.2026 by Amitendra Kishore Prasad (single judge). Petitioner (a registered society) absent without representation even in two rounds; State represented by Panel Lawyer Saumitra Kesharwani. Purely procedural disposal — cite only as an instance of dismissal for want of prosecution; carries no merits reasoning, statutory interpretation or precedent treatment.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution: the petitioner neither appeared nor made any representation to press the petition even on repeated calls in two rounds, and appears to have lost interest in pursuing the matter. ¶23

Umarkot Wale Baba Seva Samiti Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

Digitally signed by YOGESH YOGESH TIWARI TIWARI Date: 2026.07.0412:31:40 +0530

¶3

2026:CGHC:27548

¶4

NAFR

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPC No. 233 of 2023

¶7

Umarkot Wale Baba Seva Samiti A Society Registered Under The Provisions Of Chhattisgarh Society Registrikaran Adhiniyam, Office At B-10, Parshuram Nagar Behind Mining Office, Ring Road No.1, Telibandha Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Through Its President, Noor Jahan D/o Nazeer Khan Aged 54 Years President, Umarkot Wale Baba Seva Samiti, R/o B-10, Parshuram Nagar, Telibandha Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

versus

¶10

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶11

2 - Secretary, Department Of Commerce And Industries, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Collector, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh.

¶12

4 - Sub Divisional Office (Revenue), Tahsil - Pathariya , District Mungeli Chhattisgarh

¶13

5 - Tahsildar, Pathariya, District - Mungeli Chhattisgarh

¶14

6 - Station House Officer, Police Station Sargaon, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh

¶15

7 - Gram Panchayat -Sava, Janpad Panchayat Pathariya, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. Through Its Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Sava, Janpad Panchayat-Pathariya, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh.

¶16

... Respondents

¶17

(Cause-title	taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner	: None
For State	: Mr. Saumitra Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer

¶18

¶19

Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board

¶20

03.07.2026

¶21

1. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition even in two rounds.

¶22

2. Mr. Saumitra Kesharwani, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/respondents, is present.

¶23

3. Today, when the case is called, learned counsel for the petitioner is not present nor any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition on repeated calls and it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter, as such this Court has left with no other option, but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution.

¶24

4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution .

¶25

Sd/-

¶26

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge

¶27

Yogesh

Umarkot Wale Baba Seva Samiti v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Umarkot Wale Baba Seva Samiti v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Kumar Bholani Vs the Commissioner

Adimjati Seva Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Ilmidi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Bugala Bai Kurre Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dhananiya Bai Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shashi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dhaneshwar Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh