Dismissed¶27

Gram Panchayat Khapradih v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC11 May 2026WPC/2238/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; WPC No. 2238 of 2026; Gram Panchayat Khapradih v. State of Chhattisgarh (Mining Department), Collector Baloda Bazar, Environment Conservation Board and Shree Cement Company Limited; writ petition seeking mandamus for expeditious decision of petitioner's representations; withdrawn at counsel's instance without objection; dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh duly constituted petition with relevant documents; decided 12/05/2026 by Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J.; marked NAFR; no statutes or precedents cited; no merits adjudication; relevant only as an example of withdrawal-with-liberty dispositions.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh duly constituted petition along with relevant documents. ¶27

Gram Panchayat Khapradih Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

RAGHVENDRAJAT Digitally signedbyRAGHVENDRAJAT

¶3

2026:CGHC:22161

¶4

NAFR

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPC No. 2238 of 2026

¶7

1 - Gram Panchayat Khapradih Through Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Khapradih, Janpad Panchayat Simga, Distt.- Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (C.G.).

¶8

... Petitioner(s)

¶9

versus

¶10

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Mining Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Raipur (C.G.).

¶11

2 - Collector Baloda Bazar, Distt.- Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (C.G.).

¶12

3 - Environment Conservation Board Through Secretary, Environment Conservation Board, Paryawaran Bhawan, Sector-19, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Raipur (C.G.).

¶13

4 - Shree Cement Company Limited Through Chief Executive Officer, Khapradih, Tah. Simga, Distt.- Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (C.G.).

¶14

5 - Unit Head, Shree Cement Company Limited, Khapradih, Tah. Simga, Distt.- Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (C.G.).

¶15

... Respondent(s)

¶16

¶17

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Akash Agrawal, Advocate.
For Respondent(s)/State	:	Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. G.A.
For Respondent No. 3	:	Mr. ManurajSingh, Advocate.
For Respondents No. 4	:	Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Sr. Advocate
& 5		alongwith Mr. Rahul Ambast, Advocate.

¶18

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

¶19

Order on Board

¶20

12/05/2026

¶21

By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-

¶22

“10.1 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of MANDAMUS directing the respondent authorities to decide the representations made by the petitioner expeditiously within the stipulated time as framed by this Hon'ble Court and may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to take necessary actions.

¶23

10.2 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to issue any writ or direction or order as deem feet in the interest of justice.”

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh duly constituted petition along with relevant documents.

¶25

No objection has been raised from other side.

¶26

¶27

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the

¶28

aforesaid liberty.

¶29

Sd/-

¶30

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge

¶31

Raghu Jat

Gram Panchayat Khapradih v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gram Panchayat Khapradih v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gurmeet Wadhwa Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Revati Sahu Vs South Eastern Coalfields Limited

Khairaj Kumar Malghani Vs Nazul Officer, Bilaspur

Prahlad Nath Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Narsingh Reddy Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ramkumar Paikra Vs State of Chhattisgarh