Agrawal Structure Mills Ltd. Vs Union of India

2 - Coal India Limited, Through The CMD, Coal Bhawan, Premise No. 04 MAR, Plot No. AF-III, Auction Area 1A, New Town, Rajarhat, Kolkatta 700156, West Bengal.

¶11

3 - South Eastern Coalfield Limited, Through The CMD, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 495006.

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)

¶14

For Petitioner :	Mr. AbhyudaySingh,Advocate.
For Respondent No.1/ Union of India :	Mr. Niraj Baghel, Union Govt. Counsel.
For Respondents No.2 and 3 :	Mr. Vaibhav Shukla, Advocate.

¶15

Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice

¶16

Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge

¶17

Digitally signed byMOHAMMEDAADIL KHAN Date: 2026.05.0618:39:55 +0530

¶18

Order on Board

¶19

Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice

¶20

04-05-2026

¶21

2

¶22

Heard Mr. Abhyuday Singh, learned counsel for the Petitioner. Also heard Mr. Niraj Baghel, learned Union Govt. Counsel for Respondent No.1/Union of India and Mr. Vaibhav Shukla, learned counsel for Respondents No.2 and 3.

¶23

The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking the following relief(s):-

¶24

“1. This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the Respondents to revise the Auctioned ACQ and thus take consequential action to correct the FSA and Performance Security while holding and declaring that the respondents are contractually bound to revise the ACQ and FSA in term of the said agreement and thus directing the respondents to comply with the same;

¶25

This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ quashing and setting aside the termination of Fuel Supply Agreement letters dated 28.11.2025 (ANNEXURE P/2), which have been issued without consideration of the relevant facts and without providing any opportunity of personal hearing to the Petitioner to tender his explanation.

¶26

This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the Respondents to give an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner and consider his case for short lifting of coal

¶27

3

¶28

during the ensuing period, since the same was for a valid reason to avoid any illegality or allegations thereof

¶29

This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass any orders in the interest of justice.”

¶30

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing of the present petition subsequent development has taken place and he wants to take recourse to law with respect to the development as his bank guarantee has been invoked and he prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.

¶31

On the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

¶32

Sd/-

¶33

Sd/-

¶34

(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice

¶35

Aadil

Agrawal Structure Mills Ltd. v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Agrawal Structure Mills Ltd. v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Praveen Chandrakar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ajay Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Banshidhar Gupta Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ramesh Chandra Tripathi Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Anr.

Dr. Priyanka Soni Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Bablu Sonwani Vs State of Chhattisgarh