The petitioner failed to appear on multiple hearing dates including 04.08.2026, 18.08.2026, 03.09.2026 and 18.09.2026. The court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CGHC010104592024 2026:CGHC:40802
NAFR
RAGHVENDRAJAT Digitallysigned byRAGHVENDRAJAT
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 1859 of 2024
1 - Nishad Begam W/o Shri Takjjul Khan Aged About 40 Years R/o Ward No. 18, Kawardha, Tahsil Kawardha, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Urban Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
5 - Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Palika Kawardha, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
| For Petitioner(s) | : | None. |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s)/State | : | Mr. Vivek Siddharth Ojha, Panel |
| Lawyer. | ||
| For Respondent No. 5 | : | Mr. Ujjwal Kumar Gouraha, Advocate. |
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board
2
18/09/2026
Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge
Raghu Jat
Nishad Begam W/o Shri Takjjul Khan Aged About 40 Years R/o Ward No. 18, Kawardha, Tahsil Kawardha, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Urban Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
Collector Kawardha, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh
Sub Divisional Officer (Rev) Kawardha, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh
Tahsildar, Tahsil Kawardha, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh
Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Palika Kawardha, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh
Amitendra Kishore Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
