Dismissed¶24

Pramod Kumar Bhagat v. Kailash Paikra

Chhattisgarh HC16 Jul 2026WP227/875/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; WP227 No. 875 of 2026; decided 17/07/2026 by Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal; writ petition filed against non-filing of written statement dismissed as withdrawn after the written statement was filed during its pendency; petitioner Pramod Kumar Bhagat (Applicant/Plaintiff) versus respondents Kailash Paikra, Rakesh Paikra, Sivanti, Jeevanti, Dhanmet and the State of Chhattisgarh (Non Applicants/Defendants Nos. 01–06); District Sarguja, Ambikapur; counsel: Vivek Bhakta (for petitioner), Siddhant Tiwari, Panel Lawyer (for State).

What did the court decide?

In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. ¶24

Pramod Kumar Bhagat Vs Kailash Paikra — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

CGHC010254962026

2026:CGHC:30517

NAFR

Digitally signed ALOKSHARMA by ALOKSHARMADate:2026.07.17 18:07:11 +0530

¶6

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶7

WP227 No. 875 of 2026

¶8

1 - Pramod Kumar Bhagat S/o. Late Bhagat Ram, Aged About 35 Years Caste Uraon, R/o. Ward No. 17, Indira Gandhi Ward, Kedarpur, Ambikapur, Police Station Gandhi Nagar, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.)........... Applicant / Plaintiff

¶9

... Petitioner(s)

¶10

versus

¶11

1 - Kailash Paikra S/o Shri Birturam, Aged About 33 Years Caste Kanwar, R/o. Ward No. 06, Baigapara, Village Thakurpur, Police Station Gandhinagar, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) ......... Non Applicant No. 01 / Defendant No. 01

¶12

2 - Rakesh Paikra, S/o Shri Birturam, Aged About 29 Years Caste Kanwar, R/o. Ward No. 05, Imlipara, Village Thakurpur, Police Station Gandhinagar, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) ......... Non Applicant No. 02 / Defendant No. 02

¶13

3 - Sivanti, D/o. Birturam, W/o. Shri Lachhan Paikra, Aged About 28 Years Caste Kanwar, R/o. Nawapara, Police Station Gandhinagar, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) ......... Non Applicant No. 03 / Defendant No. 03

¶14

4 - Jeevanti, D/o. Birturam, W/o. Ramlal, Aged About 29 Years Caste Kanwer, R/o. Udari, Police Station And Tahsil Lundra, District Sarguja (C.G.) ......... Non Applicant No. 04 / Defendant No. 04

¶15

5 - Dhanmet, D/o. Birturam, W/o. Bude Paikra, Aged About 31 Years Caste Kanwar, R/o. Thakurpur, Police Station Gandhinagar, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) ......... Non Applicant No. 05 / Defendant No. 05

¶16

¶17

6 - The State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Collector, Sarguja, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) ......... Non Applicant No. 06 / Defendant No. 06

¶18

... Respondent(s)

¶19

(Cause title taken from Case Information System)

¶20

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vivek Bhakta, Advocate. For State : Mr. Siddhant Tiwari, Panel Lawyer.

¶21

Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board

¶22

17/07/2026

¶23

1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though the present writ petition has been filed against the nonfiling of the written statement, during the pendency of the present writ petition, the written statement has been filed before the learned trial Court, and he does not want to press the present writ petition.

¶24

2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn .

¶25

Sd/-

¶26

(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge

¶27

Alok

Pramod Kumar Bhagat v. Kailash Paikra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramod Kumar Bhagat v. Kailash Paikra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raheem Khan Vs Deendayal

Smt. Chhama Khare Vs Laxman Pradhan

Amit Kumar Dubey Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rijwan Khan Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Agriculture Insurance Company of India Ltd. Vs Branch Manager Punjab National Bank

Agriculture Insurance Company of India Ltd. Vs Branch Manager Punjab National Bank