Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution after neither the petitioner nor any representative appeared despite repeated calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CGHC010340812022 2026:CGHC:40909
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WP227 No. 661 of 2022
1 - Anil Kumar Rathore S/o Shri Ram Narayan Rathore Aged About 35 Years R/o Quarter No. 392, Main Road, Hardi Bajar, Tehsil Pali, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh
--- Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - Indusind Bank Ltd. T.P. Nagar, Korba, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh
2 - Pankaj Kumar Rathore S/o Mahavir Prasad Rathore Aged About 41 Years Qurter No. 202, Shaila Towers, Bhartiya Nagar, Bilaspur, Tehsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
--- Respondent(s)
| For Petitioner(s) | : Nonepresent. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Nonepresent. |
(Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal)
Order on Board
2
18/09/2026
None appeared on behalf of the petitioner nor any representation is made on his behalf to pursue the petition even after repeated calls.
Since no one appears and no representation is made on behalf of the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge
Anil Kumar Rathore S/o Shri Ram Narayan Rathore
Indusind Bank Ltd.
Pankaj Kumar Rathore S/o Mahavir Prasad Rathore
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
