Disposed¶26

Netram Agrawal v. Sanjay Agrawal

Chhattisgarh HC23 Jun 2026WP227/440/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; WP227 No. 440 of 2024; Netram Agrawal and others v. Sanjay Agrawal and others; writ petition disposed of as infructuous on 24/06/2026 because the civil suit was decided by the trial court on 02.08.2025; liberty to revive prayer if cause of action survives; Judge: Ravindra Kumar Agrawal; no statutory provisions or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of as infructuous; liberty granted to the petitioner to revive their prayer if cause of action still survives. ¶26

Netram Agrawal Vs Sanjay Agrawal — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:25953

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WP227 No. 440 of 2024

¶6

1 - Netram Agrawal S/o Late Manohar Lal Aged About 76 Years R/o 49 Nehru Nagar Bhiali-Durg C.G., Taluka, Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 1)

¶7

2 - Sandeep Agrawal S/o Netram Agrawal Aged About 42 Years R/o 49 Nehru Nagar Bhiali-Durg C.G., Taluka, Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 2)

¶8

3 - Reeta Agrawal W/o Dinesh Agrawal Aged About 45 Years R/o Near Chandragrih Udyog Railway Station Chindwada, District- Chindwada, M.P. (Defendant No. 3)

¶9

4 - Reena Agrawal W/o Vijay Agrawal Aged About 43 Years R/o Durga College Road, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, C.G. (Defendent No. 4)

¶10

5 - Ashish Agrawal S/o Late Arjun Ram Agrawal Aged About 40 Years R/o Khursipar Bhilai- Durg, C.G., District Durg, Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 5)

¶11

6 - Misa Finvest Pvt. Ltd. C/o Director Sandeep Agrawal, Office At 49 Nehru Nagar Bhilai- Durg C.G., District Durg, Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 6)

¶12

7 - M/s Vedika Minerals C/o Director Netram Agrawal, Office At 49 Nehru Nagar, Bhilai-Durg C.G. District Durg, Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 7)

¶13

... Petitioner(s)

¶14

versus

¶15

Digitally signed by SUGUNA SUGUNA DUBEY DUBEY Date: 2026.06.27 11:55:59 +0530

¶16

¶17

1 - Sanjay Agrawal S/o Netram Agrawal Aged About 50 Years Presently Residing At, Aishwarya Residency, Old Telibandha, Near Currency Tower, G E Road, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh (Plaintiff)

¶18

2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Collector Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 8)

¶19

3 - Municipal Corporation Bhilai Through Commissioner, Nagar Palika Nigam Supela Bhilai District- Durg, Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 9)

¶20

... Respondent(s)

¶21

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Ankit Singhal, Advocate
For Respondent No.2	: Mr. Vinod Kumar Tekam, GA
For Respondent No.3	: Mr. H.B.Agrawal, Sr.Counsel assisted by Ms. Preeti Yadav, Advocate

¶22

(Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal)

¶23

Order on Board

¶24

24/06/2026

¶25

It has been informed by the counsel for the parties that the Civil Suit has already been decided by the learned trial court on 02.08.2025 and the present writ petition has now become infructuous.

¶26

ON the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, present petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. However, liberty is granted in favour of the petitioner to revive their prayer, if cause of action still survives.

¶27

Sd/-

¶28

(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge

Netram Agrawal v. Sanjay Agrawal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Netram Agrawal v. Sanjay Agrawal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Kodiya Uraon Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

State of Chhattisgarh Vs Chhattisgarh Pensioners Samaj Collectorate Premises, Raipur

Pardeshi Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Markanday Panda Vs Arun Kumar Agrawal

Smt. Janki Bai Vs Suresh Kumar Kshetrapaal

Chandrabhushan Dewangan Vs Harishankar