Writ petition dismissed as not pressed. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the trial before the trial Court had concluded, rendering the petition infructuous, and further submitted they did not wish to press the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition on these grounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CGHC010196192022
Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2026.09.18 18:16:12 +0530
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
NAFR
WP227 No. 372 of 2022
1 - Bhagirathi Gond S/o Late Shri Gangaram Gond Aged About 45 Years R/o Village- Baridih, Tahsil Kota, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
2 - Kamla Bai Gond W/o Shri Panchram Gond Aged About 48 Years R/o Village- Baridih, Tahsil Kota, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
3 - Bachanbai Gond D/o Gangaram Gond Aged About 50 Years W/o Trilok Singh, R/o Village Mohli, Tahsil- Kota, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
4 - Kadam Bai Gond D/o Late Shri Gangaram Gond Aged About 48 Years W/o Shri Sukhnandan Gond, R/o Village Donasagar, Tahsil Kota, DistrictBilaspur, Chhattisgarh
5 - Bimla Bai Gond D/o Late Shri Gangaram Gond Aged About 47 Years R/o Village Gobripat, Tahsil Kota, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - Barata Bai Gond D/o Kundarwa Aged About 70 Years R/o Village- Baridih, Tahsil Kota, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
2 - Mohan Gond S/o Bhuvan Singh Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Chorha (Singhanpuri), Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
3 - Hajari Gond S/o Bhuvan Singh Aged About 46 Years R/o Village Chorha (Singhanpuri), Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
4 - Sukhiram Gond S/o Bhuvan Singh Aged About 44 Years R/o Village Chorha (Singhanpuri), Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
5 - Ramoutin Gond (Died) Through- Lr's
5.1 - Smt. Ganga Bai W/o Ramphal R/o Village- Bidawal, Achanakmar, PostAchanakmar, Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
5.2 - Smt. Jamuna Bai W/o Lalji R/o Village And Post Madanpur, TahsilTakhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
5.3 - Smt. Triveni W/o Malikram R/o Village Sawantpur, Junapara, Tahsil And District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh
2
5.4 - Smt. Savitri W/o Dukhiram R/o Village Sawantpur, Junapara, Tahsil And District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh
5.5 - Smt. Gayatri Bai W/o Kunwar Singh R/o Village Jamkot, Post Kanteli, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh
5.6 - Smt. Sampatti Bai W/o Bhagirathi R/o Village Navapara, Baridih, Post0 Chapora, Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
6 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Keshav Dewangan, Advocate. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent No. 1 to | : Mr. Ayush Tamboli, Advocate on behalf of Mr. |
| 4. | Aman Tamboli, Advocate |
| For State | : Mr. Karan Baharani, Panel Lawyer. |
Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board
18/09/2026
1. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the trial before the learned trial Court has already been concluded and, therefore, the present writ petition has become infructuous. He further submits that he does not want to press the present petition.
2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge
Alok
Bhagirathi Gond and others
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
