Dismissed¶23

Ramdas (Died) v. Firantin Bai

Chhattisgarh HC15 Apr 2026SA/675/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

SA No. 675 of 2019; High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge; decided 16.04.2026. Appellants: Ramdas (died 14.01.2006) and Babudas (died 28.06.2002), sons of Gambhirdas Panka; Respondents: Firantin Bai and State of Chhattisgarh through Collector Balodabazar. Advocates: Shobhit Koshta (appellants), Sunil Sahu (Respondent No. 1), Malay Jain, Panel Lawyer (State). Point raised: how the first appellate-court appeal was filed on behalf of deceased persons. Counsel had no instructions from LRs of appellants. Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution; no merits decided; non-citable as precedent on merits.

What the court decided

Ramdas (Died) Vs Firantin Bai — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:17375

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

SA No. 675 of 2019

¶6

1. Ramdas (Died) S/o Gambhirdas Panka Aged About 85 Years (Died On 14.01.2006) R/o Village Hasuva, Tahsil Kasdol, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh, At Present R/o Belha, PostKharaud, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

¶7

Digitally signed by JYOTI JYOTI SHARMA SHARMA Date: 2026.04.17 10:47:49 +0530

¶8

2. Babudas (Died) S/o Gambhirdas Panka Aged About 60 Years (Died On 28/06/2002), R/o Village Hasuva, Tahsil Kasdol, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh, At Present R/o Belha, PostKharaud, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

¶9

... Appellant(s)

¶10

versus

¶11

1. Firantin Bai W/o Biharidas Panka Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Singhul, Tahsil Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶12

2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector Balodabazar, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : BalodabazarBhathapara, Chhattisgarh

¶13

... Respondent(s)

¶14

(Cause title taken from CIS)

¶15

For Appellants	: Shri Shobhit Koshta, Advocate
For Respondent No. 1	: Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate
For Respondent No.	: Shri Malay Jain, Panel Lawyer.
2/State

¶16

Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge

Order on Board

16.04.2026

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that though time was sought for explaining how the appeal before the First Appellate Court was filed on behalf of the deceased persons, which is under

¶21

challenge before this court.

¶22