Dismissed¶¶30

Chandarmati Died Through legal Representative v. Chandrika

Chhattisgarh HC19 Jan 2026SA/577/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for want of prosecution; non-compliance of court order dated 25.09.2025; last opportunity granted 15.01.2026; no appearance for appellant despite repeated calls; High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; SA No. 577 of 2016; decided 20/01/2026 by Bibhu Datta Guru, J.; appellant-side counsel absent ('For Appellant(s): None'); Respondent/State counsel Lekhram Dhruv, P.L.; NAFR; 2026:CGHC:3198.

What did the court decide?

Since no one appeared on behalf of the appellant to prosecute the matter despite repeated calls, the Court was left with no other option but to dismiss the case for want of prosecution. ¶¶29

Chandarmati Died Through legal Representative Vs Chandrika — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:3198

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

SA No. 577 of 2016

¶6

1. Chandarmati Died Through Legal Representative

¶7

1.1. Fulmat Bai W/o Brajlal, Aged About 45 Years S/o Bhagirathi Satnami, R/o Village- Rasedi, Tahsil- Balodabazar, Distt. BalodabazarBhatapara, Chhattisgarh

¶8

Digitally signed by JYOTI JYOTI SHARMA SHARMA Date: 2026.01.21 11:39:25 +0530

¶9

1.2. Deendayal S/o Bhagirathi Satnami, Aged About 35 Years R/o Village- Sonadih, Tahsil- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

¶10

... Appellant(s)

¶11

versus

¶12

1. Chandrika S/o Salikram Satnami, Aged About 45 Years R/o VillageSonadih, Tahsil Balodabazar, Distt. Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

¶13

2. Ambika S/o Salikram Satnami, Aged About 43 Years R/o VillageSonadih, Tahsil Balodabazar, Distt. Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

¶14

3. Amrit S/o Salikram Satnami, Aged About 38 Years R/o VillageSonadih, Tahsil Balodabazar, Distt. Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

¶15

4. Gaindram S/o Salikram Satnami, Aged About 32 Years R/o VillageSonadih, Tahsil Balodabazar, Distt. Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

¶16

5. Gaindmati S/o Salikram Satnami, Aged About 32 Years R/o VillageSonadih, Tahsil Balodabazar, Distt. Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

¶17

6. Gaindibai D/o Salikram Satnami, Aged About 31 Years R/o VillageSonadih, Tahsil Balodabazar, Distt. Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

¶18

7. Bajrahin Wd/o Salikram Satnami, Aged About 68 Years R/o VillageSonadih, Tahsil Balodabazar, Distt. Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 8. Sonu S/o Gajpati Satnami Died

¶19

¶20

8.A. Chandraji S/o Sonu Satnami, Aged About 45 Years R/o Present Address- Budgahan, Tahsil- Balodabazar, Distt. BalodabazarBhatapara, Chhattisgarh

¶21

9. Nana Bai Wd/o Malikram Satnami, Aged About 65 Years R/o VillageSonadih, Tahsil Balodabazar, Distt. Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

¶22

10. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Collector, Present Distt. Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

¶23

... Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : None For Respondent/ : Mr. Lekhram Dhruv, P.L. State

¶24

Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge

¶25

Order on Board

¶26

20/01/2026

¶27

The matter is listed on default for non compliance of court order dated 25.09.2025.

¶28

On 15.01.2026, last opportunity was granted to learned counsel for the appellant to comply with the order dated 25.09.2025, but till date the same has not been complied with.

¶29

On repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the appellant to prosecute the matter. Since, no one is appearing, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the case for want of prosecution.

¶30

Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶31

Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE

¶32

Jyoti

Chandarmati Died Through legal Representative v. Chandrika

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandarmati Died Through legal Representative v. Chandrika

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Salikram Sonkar Vs Vishal Sonkar

Smt. Itwara Bai (Died) Vs Doojram

Sandeep Sen Vs Sujan Singh Gambhir and Ors.

Anantram Vs Shobha Singh

Himanshu Patel Vs Smt. Kumudlata Patel

Texmaco Rail and Engineering Limited, Vs Steel Authority of India