Dismissed¶31
Gangadhar v. Vimal Kumar Jain
Chhattisgarh HCSA/524/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; SA No. 524 of 2018; Second Appeal; dismissed for want of prosecution / dismissal in default; appellants absent, no representation on repeated calls; loss of interest; parties from District Jashpur (Village Tatkela, Bagicha) including Collector, Jashpur as respondent No. 6; Respondents' counsel Shri Lekhram Dhruv, Panel Lawyer; appellants' column marked 'None'; Single Judge: Bibhu Datta Guru, J.; order dated 02.04.2026; NAFR; no merits decided.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution: none appeared nor made any representation on behalf of the appellants to press the appeal on repeated calls, and it appeared the appellants had lost interest in pursuing the matter. ¶31