Baliram v. Thalesh
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; SA No. 399 of 2016; decided 24/03/2026 by Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru. Baliram and Mus Parwati (appellants; Mus Chandravati deleted as deceased) v. Thalesh, Hirendra, Santosh, Mus Nilendri, Rajesh, Rupesh, Rita, Mamta, Mina, Mus Kalawati, Prahalad and State of Chhattisgarh (respondents). Second appeal dismissed for want of prosecution on account of the appellant's non-appearance on repeated calls; no merits adjudicated; no statutes or precedents cited. Counsel: Santosh Bharat for Respondent Nos. 1-11; Lekhram Dhruw, Panel Lawyer, for Respondent No. 12; none for the appellants.
What did the court decide?
None appeared for the appellant despite the case having been called out on repeated calls; the Court recorded that the appellant appears to have lost interest in pursuing the appeal.