Shabnam Mirza v. Mahmooda Begum And Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; SA No. 393 of 2014; second appeal dismissed for want of prosecution on 29.01.2026 by Bibhu Datta Guru, J.; appellant absent despite repeated calls; application for substitution of legal representatives of respondent No. 2 not filed despite last opportunity of 16.01.2026; no merits adjudication, no statutory provisions or case law discussed; limited precedential value.
What did the court decide?
It appears that the appellant has lost interest in pursuing the present matter, having neither appeared despite repeated calls nor filed the application for substitution of the legal representatives of respondent No. 2. ¶¶22