Smt. Mathura Bai v. Smt. Sangita Bai
Case brief
What is this about?
Chhattisgarh High Court at Bilaspur; S.A. No. 251 of 2017; second appeal dismissed for want of prosecution; no appearance/representation by appellants despite repeated calls; Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput; order dated 15/06/2026; NAFR; appellants (defendants): Smt. Mathura Bai, Manoj Kumar, Mahesh Kumar, Mahendra Kumar - heirs of Late Jagatram Netam, Village Parvi, Bhanupratappur, Kanker; respondents (plaintiffs/defendants): Smt. Sangita Bai, Ku. Dipika @ Priyani (minor), Ku. Dipti (minor), Project Officer Woman And Child Welfare Durgukondal, District Programme Officer Woman And Child Development, State of Chhattisgarh through Collector, North Bastar Kanker; counsel: Shri Anand Gupta, Dy. G.A. for Respondent/State; all pending applications disposed of; no statute cited, no precedent cited, no quantum awarded.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution because, despite repeated calls, no representation has been made on behalf of the appellants.