Alagram And Anr. v. Balram And Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
SA No. 229 of 2014, High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, decided 21/01/2026 by Bibhu Datta Guru, J.: second appeal (Alagram And Anr. and Khikh Bai v. Balram And Ors. and others, incl. State of Chhattisgarh) dismissed for want of prosecution due to appellants' repeated non-appearance; no counsel for appellants (For Appellants: None); respondents/State represented by Lekhram Dhruw, Panel Lawyer; no merits adjudication, no statutes or cases cited.
What did the court decide?
None appeared for the appellants and no representation was made to press the appeal despite repeated calls. ¶¶38