Dismissed¶27

Smt. Savitri v. Chamru

Chhattisgarh HC10 Feb 2026SA/117/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court Bilaspur; SA No. 117 of 2018; second appeal; dismissal for want of prosecution; non-appearance of appellants; repeated calls; appellants lost interest; no representation; Justice Bibhu Datta Guru; order dated 11/02/2026; parties from Village Singitana, Lakhanpur, District Surguja; Savitri, Bhinsari, Radha v. Chamru, Vinay Kumar, Shivshankar Sahu, State of Chhattisgarh, Aash Kumar Sahu; counsel Mr. Malay Jain, Panel Lawyer for Respondent/State.

What did the court decide?

Since none appeared nor made any representation for the appellants on repeated calls, and the appellants appear to have lost interest in pursuing the matter, the appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. ¶27

Smt. Savitri Vs Chamru — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:7491

SOURABH BHILWAR

Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2026.02.11 17:20:40 +0530

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

NAFR

¶7

SA No. 117 of 2018

¶8

1 - Smt. Savitri W/o Shri Rudan Aged About 58 Years R/o Village Singitana, Police Station And Tahsil Lakhanpur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

¶9

2 - Smt. Bhinsari (Wrongly Mentioned As Minsari) Wd/o Late Rudan Aged About 53 Years R/o Village Singitana, Police Station And Tahsil Lakhanpur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh

¶10

3 - Smt. Radha D/o Late Rudan Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Singitana, Police Station And Tahsil Lakhanpur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh (Defendants)

¶11

... Appellant

¶12

versus

¶13

1 - Chamru S/o Shri Kanwal Sai Aged About 78 Years R/o Village Singitana, Police Station And Tahsil Lakhanpur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh (Plaintiff)

¶14

2 - Vinay Kumar S/o Late Kunj Bihari Lal Gupta Aged About 53 Years R/o Manipur, Ambikapur, Police Station And Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh (Defendant No.4)

¶15

3 - Shivshankar Sahu S/o Shri Banjar Sahu Aged About 40 Years R/o

¶16

¶17

Manipur, Ambikapur, Police Station And Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh (Defendant No.5)

¶18

4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The District Collector Surguja, Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

¶19

5 - Aash Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Banjar Sahu Aged About 29 Years R/o Manipur, Bilaspur Chowk, Ambikapur, Police Station And Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh

¶20

... Respondents

¶21

(Cause title is taken from CIS)

¶22

For Appellants : None For Respondent/ State : Mr. Malay Jain, Panel Lawyer

¶23

(HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board

¶24

11/02/2026

¶25

None appears nor any representation made on behalf of the appellants to press this appeal on repeated calls.

¶26

In view of the above, it appears that the appellants have lost interest in pursuing the present matter.

¶27

Accordingly, the present appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶28

Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU)

¶29

JUDGE

¶30

$. Bhilwar

Smt. Savitri v. Chamru

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Savitri v. Chamru

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saras Kumar Chandrakar Vs Smt. Rajeshwari

Kailash @ Duliram Vs Tarachand Gupta

Rajendra Kumar Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Bhagat Ram Vs Heera Lal

Yudhistir Kumar Sahu Vs Manoj Kumar

Bhanwar Lal Soni Vs Chaitram Dhankar