Disposed¶22

Manoj Mishra v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC21 Apr 2026REVP/62/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; review petition REVP No. 62 of 2026 (neutral citation 2026:CGHC:18452; marked NAFR); petitioner Manoj Mishra versus State of Chhattisgarh, Superintendent of Police Bilaspur, SHO Police Station Sarkanda, Nilesh Pandey (then Town Inspector/Incharge, PS Sarkanda) and Rajesh Mishra; disposed of on 22/04/2026 by Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas following settlement/compromise deed dated 22.04.2026 taken on record; petitioner withdrew from pursuing the review petition; no legal issue decided, no statute or case cited.

What the court decided

AI extract

Manoj Mishra Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Page 1 of 2

2026:CGHC:18452

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

REVP No. 62 of 2026

¶6

1 - Manoj Mishra S/o Late Brijesh Mishra Aged About 43 Years R/o Vijaypuram Colony Sarkanda Tehsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶7

... Petitioner(s)

¶8

versus

¶9

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Home Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya P.S, And Post Rakhi Atal Nagar Nava Raipur, DistrictRaipur (C.G.)

¶10

2 - Superintendent Of Police District- Bilaspur (C.G.) Office At Nehru Chowk Tehsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶11

3 - Station House Officer Police Station Sarkanda Tehsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶12

4 - Shri Nilesh Pandey Then The Town Inspector/ Incharge Police Station Sarkanda (Presently Line Attachaed) Bilaspur C.G. Through Superintendent Of Police District- Bilaspur C.G

¶13

5 - Rajesh Mishra S/o Late Lalta Prasad Mishra Aged About 60 Years R/o Shri Ramkrishna Enclave Near Sudha Sales Nutan Chowk Block- No.102, Sarkanda Tehsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶14

... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Bajpai & Ms. Pooja Sinha, Advocate. For State : Mr. Krishna Gopal Yadav, Dy. Govt. Advocate & Mr. Manish Kashyap, Panel Lawyer. For Resp. No. 4 : Mr. Sameer Rigri, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sachin Nidhi, Advocate. For Resp. No. 5 : Mr. Malay Shrivastava, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

¶15

Order on Board

¶16

22/04/2026

¶17

It has been informed before this Court that during pendency of this petition, a settlement has been arrived at between the parties today i.e. 22.04.2026.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that since the parties have settled their dispute, therefore, the petitioner is not inclined to

¶19

Digitally signed by ARUN ARUN KUMAR KUMAR DEWANGAN DEWANGAN Date: 2026.04.22 17:10:19 +0530

¶20

Page 2 of 2

¶21

proceed further with the instant review petition.

¶22

In view of the aforesaid submission as well as the settlement arrived at between the parties on 22.04.2026, the instant review petition is disposed of.

¶23

The compromise deed dated 22.04.2026 arrived at between the parties which has been submitted by respondent No. 5 through covering memo is taken on record.

¶24

Sd/(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge

¶25

Arun

Manoj Mishra v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Manoj Mishra v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jaya Chandrakar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

State of Chhattisgarh Vs Narayan Pardhi

Arun Kumar Pathak Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Anand Mongre Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Bhagat Ram @ Bhagturam Meghwani (Died) Vs Shiv Kumar Soni

Anil Tuteja Vs State of Chhattisgarh