Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Fulkumar Jaiswal Vs the State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Home
Chhattisgarh HC
2026
Fulkumar Jaiswal Vs the State of ChhattisgarhFulkumar Jaiswal v. the State of Chhattisgarh

Dismissed¶29

Fulkumar Jaiswal v. the State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC5 Jul 2026REVP/39/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Review Petition (REVP No. 39 of 2026), High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, single judge Narendra Kumar Vyas; order dated 06.07.2026; dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel (Roop Ram Naik) failed across hearings of 18.02.2026, 03.03.2026 and 06.04.2026 to answer the Court's query on the provision/contingency making the review maintainable, and on 06.07.2026 was permitted to withdraw the petition. Petitioner: Fulkumar Jaiswal, Assistant Teacher (L.B.). Respondents: State of Chhattisgarh (Secretary, School Education; panel lawyer Khulesh Sahu); rationalization committee functionaries of Bilaspur Division, Sarangarh-Bilaigarh district, Bilaigarh tahsil and Sarangarh/Bilaigarh blocks; and Premlal Jaiswal, Assistant Teacher. No statutes, precedents or monetary amounts; impugned order not described; maintainability question left unanswered.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for withdrawal of the Review Petition allowed; Review Petition dismissed as withdrawn.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Prayer for withdrawal of the Review Petition allowed; Review Petition dismissed as withdrawn.

Issue for consideration

Maintainability of the Review Petition: under what provision, and in which contingency, the present Review Petition was maintainable (query posed by the Court; counsel never furnished an answer).

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, REVP No. 39 of 2026 (Narendra Kumar Vyas, Judge; order dated 06.07.2026): Review Petition by Fulkumar Jaiswal, Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Government Primary School Parsabhantha, against the State of Chhattisgarh (Secretary, Department of School Education), the Presidents/Secretaries of the Divisional (Bilaspur), District (Sarangarh-Bilaigarh), Sub-Divisional/Tahsil (Bilaigarh) and Block (Sarangarh and Bilaigarh) Rationalization Committees, and fellow Assistant Teacher Premlal Jaiswal. Over hearings on 18.02.2026, 03.03.2026 and 06.04.2026 the Court pressed counsel to state the provision and contingency rendering the Review Petition maintainable; counsel repeatedly sought time and never answered. On 06.07.2026 counsel instead prayed for withdrawal; the prayer was allowed and the Review Petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No statutory provision or precedent is cited and no merits issue was decided.

A

1

CGHC010031512026

2026:CGHC:27717

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

REVP No. 39 of 2026

Digitally ABHIGYA signed by SAXENA ABHIGYA SAXENA

1 - Fulkumar Jaiswal S/o Shri Purushottam Jaiswal Aged About 46 Years Occupation- Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Presently Working At Government Primary School - Parsabhantha, Block- Bilaigarh, DistrictSarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.)

... Petitioner(s)

versus

1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.)

2 - The Commissioner President Of Rationalization, Committee, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.)

3 - The Joint Director / Secretary Divisional Rationalization Committee Education Division Bilaspur (C.G.)

4 - The Collector/president Of District Rationalization Committee, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.)

5 - The District Education Officer/secretary Of District Rationalization Committee, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.)

6 - The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue)/president Of Rationalization Committee, Tahsil- Bilaigarh, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.)

2

7 - The Block Education Officer/secretary Of Rationalization Committee Block- Sarangarh, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.)

8 - The Block Education Officer/secretary Of Rationalization Committee Block- Bilaigarh, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.)

9 - Premlal Jaiswal Occupation- Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Presently Working At Government Primary School - Pahanda, Block- Sarangarh, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.)

... Respondent(s)

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Roop Ram Naik, Advocate For State : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Order on Board

06.07.2026

The matter was initially heard on 18.02.2026 . During the course of hearing, this Court put a specific query to the learned counsel for the petitioner as to under what provision and in which contingency the present Review Petition was maintainable. Upon such query being raised, learned counsel for the petitioner sought time to address the issue. Thereafter, the matter was again taken up on 03.03.2026 , when learned counsel for the petitioner once again prayed for further time to satisfy the query raised by this Court. On the subsequent date of hearing, i.e., 06.04.2026 , learned counsel for the petitioner requested that the matter be listed on 07.05.2026 and subsequently, the matter came to be listed today,

i.e., 06.07.2026 .

3

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, despite having been afforded sufficient opportunities over a considerable period to address the maintainability of the Review Petition, learned counsel for the petitioner, instead of answering the query raised by this Court, prayed for permission to withdraw the present Review Petition.

In view of the aforesaid, the prayer for withdrawal of the present Review Petition is allowed and the Review Petition is, accordingly,

dismissed as withdrawn .

Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge

Saxena

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Maintainability of the Review Petition: under what provision, and in which contingency, the present Review Petition was maintainable (query posed by the Court; counsel never furnished an answer).¶25

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Prior proceeding
Review Petition first heard on 18.02.2026; the Court put a specific query as to under what provision and in which contingency the Review Petition was maintainable; petitioner's counsel sought time to address the issue.¶25
Prior proceeding
Matter taken up again on 03.03.2026; petitioner's counsel once again prayed for further time to satisfy the Court's query.¶25
Prior proceeding
On 06.04.2026 petitioner's counsel requested that the matter be listed on 07.05.2026; the matter was subsequently listed for 06.07.2026.¶25
Prior proceeding
At the hearing on 06.07.2026, despite having been afforded sufficient opportunities over a considerable period to address maintainability, counsel did not answer the Court's query and prayed for permission to withdraw the Review Petition.¶28

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Fulkumar Jaiswal¶8
Roop Ram Naik
respondent
The State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.)¶11
Khulesh Sahu
respondent
The Commissioner President Of Rationalization, Committee, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.)¶12
respondent
The Joint Director / Secretary Divisional Rationalization Committee Education Division Bilaspur (C.G.)¶13
respondent
The Collector/president Of District Rationalization Committee, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.)¶14
respondent
The District Education Officer/secretary Of District Rationalization Committee, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.)¶15
respondent
The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue)/president Of Rationalization Committee, Tahsil- Bilaigarh, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.)¶16
respondent
The Block Education Officer/secretary Of Rationalization Committee Block- Sarangarh, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.)¶18
respondent
The Block Education Officer/secretary Of Rationalization Committee Block- Bilaigarh, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.)¶19
respondent
Premlal Jaiswal¶20

Coram

AI extract

Narendra Kumar Vyasauthor¶22

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Chhattisgarh HC
Decided on: 5 Jul 2026 · July
Registered: 4 Feb 2026
Case no.: REVP/39/2026
CNR: CGHC010031512026
Bench: Narendra Kumar Vyas
Disposal: WITHDRAWN
Case type: REVP

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Narendra Kumar Vyas

Govind Ram Narang, Vs State of Chhattisgarh
2 Jul 2026
Anant Narayan Singh Vs Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited
1 Jul 2026
Sunil Kumar Agrawal Vs Directorate of Enforcement
1 Jul 2026
Walson (Died) Vs V.P. Rai (Died) through Legal Heirs
5 Jul 2026
Sanjay Kol Vs State of Chhattisgarh
5 Jul 2026
Usatlal Sahu Vs the State of Chhattisgarh
5 Jul 2026

Cite this judgement

Fulkumar Jaiswal v. the State of Chhattisgarh, REVP/39/2026 (CG), decided on 5 July 2026.

The High Court of Chhattisgarh publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Procedural history4

Review Petition first heard on 18.02.2026; the Court put a specific query as to under what provision and in which contingency the Review Petition was maintainable; petitioner's counsel sought time to address the issue.
Matter taken up again on 03.03.2026; petitioner's counsel once again prayed for further time to satisfy the Court's query.

View full history

Bench / Coram

Narendra Kumar Vyas

Parties & counsel