The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed an application for regular bail filed by an accused in a murder case involving setting deceased on fire and assault with a sickle, finding no fit case for bail but directing the trial court to expedite proceedings.
Application for bail dismissed; trial court directed to expedite trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CGHC010339782026
2026:CGHC:40318
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCRC No. 8562 of 2026
Seema Sahu W/o Lalji Sahu Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Ramgarh, P. S. City Cotwali, Mungeli, District Mungeli, C. G.
... Applicant
versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station City Kotwali, Mungeli, District Mungeli, C. G.
Digitally signed by ALFIZA ALFIZA BAIG Date: BAIG 2026.09.16 15:50:46 +0530
... Respondent For Applicant : Ms. Indrapreet Kaur Chhabra, Advocate For Respondent-State: Mr. Ramnarayan Sahu, Dy. Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
ORDER ON BOARD
15.09.2026
2
3
do not find present to be a fit case to allow the application, accordingly,
application is dismissed.
Certified copy as per rules. Sd/-
(Parth Prateem Sahu)
JUDGE
alfiza
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to grant of regular bail under Section 483 BNSS in a murder case involving assault with a sickle.
Whether the trial court should expedite the proceedings given the period of detention.
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Seema Sahu
State Of Chhattisgarh
Shri Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
