Allowed

Vikas Kumar Surya v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC17 Sept 2026MCRC/8222/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants regular bail to the applicant, Vikas Kumar Surya, arrested for illicit liquor possession under the CG Excise Act The High Court allowed the bail application imposed security conditions ordering release upon execution of a personal bond with one surety.

What did the court decide?

Release on regular bail upon execution of a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with one surety for a fair trial.

Vikas Kumar Surya Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Bail and Remand | Chhattisgarh HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

CGHC010342852026 2026:CGHC:40829

¶3

NAFR

¶4

Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.09.18 15:39:32 +0530

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

MCRC No. 8222 of 2026

¶7

*** -** Vikas Kumar Surya S/o Chiku Kumar Surya Aged About 20 Years R/o Ward No. 9 Chipiyapara, Mahasamund, P.S. Mahasamund Tehsil And DistrictMahasamund (C.G.)

¶8

... Applicant

¶9

Versus

¶10

- State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S.- Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund, (C.G.)

¶11

... Non-Applicant

¶12

For Applicant : Mr. Sudhanshu Kumar Singh, Advocate For Non-Applicant : Ms. Smriti Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer

¶13

Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board

¶14

18/09/2026

¶15

The applicant has preferred this first bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 as he is in jail since 07.06.2026 in connection with Crime No. 336/2026 registered in Police Station – Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (CG) for commission of offence punishable under Sections 34(2) of CG Excise Act.

¶16

Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the applicant was found in possession of 6.300 bulk liter of illicit country made liquor without having valid license and accordingly, the offence has been registered against the applicant and he was arrested on 07.06.2026.

¶17

¶18

Learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated. He further submits that the charge-sheet has been filed. He also submits that liquor has not been seized from exclusive possession of applicant. He would contend that though there are 02 criminal antecedents of similar nature against the applicant, but in 01 case he has already been acquitted from the trial Court and 01 is pending. He would submit that the applicant is languishing in jail since 07.06.2026, therefore, he may be released on regular bail.

¶19

On the other hand, the learned State counsel opposed the bail application of present applicant. He submits that there are 02 criminal antecedents of similar nature against the present applicant in which he has already been acquitted from trial Court in 01 case and 01 is pending. He contends that the charge-sheet has been filed.

¶20

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

¶21

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, quantity of liquor seized from the applicant, charge-sheet has been filed and the applicant is in jail from 07.06.2026, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the present applicant.

¶22

Accordingly, the instant bail application of the applicant is allowed .

¶23

It is directed that in the event of the applicant executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court, he shall be released on bail on the following conditions:-

¶24

I. He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the

¶25

¶26

case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such fact to the Court;

¶27

II. He shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to a fair and expeditious trial;

¶28

III. He shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court till the disposal of the trial; and,

¶29

IV. He shall not involve himself in any offence of a similar nature in future.

¶30

The observation made in the course of this order is only for considering the case of the applicant on the application for the grant of regular bail. The concerned trial Court shall not be influenced or bound by any observation made in the course of this order.

¶31

Certified copy as per rules.

¶32

Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge

¶33

vatti

Vikas Kumar Surya v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikas Kumar Surya v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases