Allowed

Parwati Jaiswal v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC14 Sept 2026MCRC/8081/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A bail petition under BNSS Section 483 was allowed for an applicant accused of liquor manufacturing. The court considered the length of custody and lack of criminal antecedents in granting bail with a personal bond.

What did the court decide?

The applicant shall be released on executing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with one surety, subject to conditions of appearing in trial court.

Parwati Jaiswal Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2026)

CGHC010336482026

2026:CGHC:40230

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

MCRC No. 8081 of 2026

¶7

Parwati Jaiswal W/o Sukhdev Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Puchheli, Police Station Pathariya, District Mungeli (C.G.). … Applicant Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE

¶8

versus

¶9

State of Chhattisgarh Through Divisional Flying Scot, Excise Division Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). ... Non-applicant

¶10

For Applicant : Mr. Chandra Kumar, Advocate For Non-applicant : Ms. Priya Sharma, Panel Lawyer

¶11

Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

¶12

Order on Board

¶13

15.09.2026

¶14

The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as she has been arrested in connection with Crime No.67/2026, registered at Divsional Fying Scot, Excise Division Bilaspur, District Bilaspur for the offence punishable under Sections 34(2) & 59 (A) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act.

¶15

The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the officers of Divsional Fying Scot, Excise Division Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, received a secret information from the informant and on the basis of the said

¶16

¶17

information conducted a raid and seized 17.46 liter country made plain liquor from the possession of the applicant, thereafter, Police has registered an aforesaid offence against the present applicant.

¶18

Learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that the applicant has falsely been implicated in the present case. He would further submit that the present applicant has no criminal antecedents. The applicant is in jail since 13.08.2026; the charge-sheet has already been filed, and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time; thus, he prays for grant of regular bail to the present applicant.

¶19

On the other hand, the learned State counsel would oppose the bail application and submit that the charge-sheet has already been filed before the competent Court. She would further submit that 17.46 liters of country made liquor was seized from the possession of the present applicant, therefore, he is not entitled to grant of regular bail.

¶20

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

¶21

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of the allegations levelled against the applicant, and the fact that the present applicant has no criminal antecedents, and further considering that the applicant is in jail since 13.08.2026, the charge-sheet has already been filed, and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the present applicant. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed .

¶22

It is directed that in the event of the applicant executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, she shall be released on bail, on following conditions :-

¶23

(I) she shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such fact to the Court,

¶24

¶25

(ii) she shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial, and

¶26

(iii) she shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to her by the said Court till disposal of the trial.

¶27

The observation made hereinabove is for the purpose of deciding this bail application only, the trial Court shall decide the case on its own merits.

¶28

Sd/-

¶29

Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judge

¶30

Nadim

Parwati Jaiswal v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parwati Jaiswal v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases