Allowed

Anendra Yadav v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC14 Sept 2026MCRC/7772/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-judge order granting regular bail to an applicant arrested for possession of country-made liquor, despite criminal antecedents and a filed charge-sheet.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on personal bond for Rs.50,000 with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

What the court decided

Anendra Yadav Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Bail and Remand | Chhattisgarh HC (2026)

CGHC010325732026

2026:CGHC:40213

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

MCRC No. 7772 of 2026

¶7

Anendra Yadav S/o Lakhan Lal Yadav Aged About 40 Years R/o Ward No. 15, Kharod, P.S. Shivrinarayan, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.).

¶8

--- Applicant

¶9

versus

¶10

State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Shivrinarayan, District- JanjgirChampa (C.G.). --- Non-applicant

¶11

For Applicant : Mr. C. P. Lahrey, Advocate For Non-applicant : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Panel Lawyer

¶12

Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

¶13

Order on Board

¶14

15/09/2026

¶15

The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No.227/2026, registered at Police Station Shivrinarayan, District – Janjgir-Champa for the offence punishable under Sections 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act.

¶16

The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the officers of Police Station Shivrinarayan, District Janjgir-Champa, received a secret information from the informant and on the basis of the said information conducted a raid and seized 25.5 bulk liter country made liquor from the possession of the applicant, thereafter,

¶17

¶18

Police has registered an aforesaid offence against the present applicant.

¶19

Learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that the applicant has falsely been implicated in the present case and he is innocent. He would further submit that the applicant has four criminal antecedents. The first case is under Section 34(1)(a) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, which has already been disposed of; the second case is under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, in which the applicant has been acquitted; the third case is under Sections 294, 506, 323 and 324 read with Section 34 of the IPC, which has also been disposed of; and the fourth case, under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, is presently pending consideration. Learned counsel would further submit that the applicant is in jail since 14.07.2026, the charge-sheet has already been filed, and the trial is likely to take considerable time to conclude; thus, he would pray that the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail.

¶20

On the other hand, the learned State counsel would oppose the bail application and submit that the charge-sheet has already been filed before the competent Court. He would further submit that 25.5 liters of country made liquor was seized from the possession of the present applicant, therefore, he is not entitled to grant of regular bail.

¶21

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

¶22

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of the allegations levelled against the applicant, and the fact that the applicant has four criminal antecedents, the first under Section 34(1)(a) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, which has already been disposed of; the second under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, in which the applicant has been acquitted; the third under Sections 294, 506, 323 and 324 read with Section 34 of the IPC, which has also been disposed of; and the fourth under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, which is presently pending consideration; and further considering that the charge-sheet has already been filed, the applicant is in jail since 14.07.2026, and the trial is likely to take some time to conclude, this Court is

¶23

¶24

inclined to grant regular bail to the applicant. Accordingly, the bail application is

¶25

allowed .

¶26

It is directed that in the event of the applicant executing a personal bond for a sum o f Rs.50,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, he shall be released on bail, on following conditions :-

¶27

(I) he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such fact to the Court,

¶28

(ii) he shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial, and

¶29

(iii) he shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court till disposal of the trial.

¶30

The observation made hereinabove is for the purpose of deciding this bail application only, the trial Court shall decide the case on its own merits.

Sd/-

Rakesh Mohan Pandey

JUDGE

Nadim

Anendra Yadav v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Anendra Yadav v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases