Dismissed

Sundarlal Sinha v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC15 Sept 2026MCRC/6840/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court dismissed the first bail applications filed by two applicants under Section 483 BNSS 2023. The applications, withdrawn by counsel citing medical ailments, were dismissed as withdrawn. The State was directed to ensure proper medical care.

What did the court decide?

Bail applications dismissed as withdrawn; direction to State authorities to provide proper medical care and submit medical progress reports.

Sundarlal Sinha Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Bail and Remand | Chhattisgarh HC (2026)

CGHC010271052026

2026:CGHC:40479

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

MCRC No. 6608 of 2026

¶7

1 - Kishun Sinha S/o Late Kacharu Ram Sinha Aged About 58 Years R/o Village- Garka, Shiv Mandir Para, P.S. Keshkal District- Kondagaon (C.G.)

¶8

--- Applicant(s)

¶9

versus

¶10

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Police Station Keshkal DistrictKondagaon (C.G.)

¶11

--- Respondent(s)

¶12

MCRC No. 6840 of 2026

¶13

1 - Sundarlal Sinha S/o Late Kacharu Ram Sinha Aged About 60 Years R/o Village- Garka, Shiv Mandir Para, P.S. Keshkal, District- Kondagaon, (C.G.)

¶14

---Applicant(s)

¶15

Versus

¶16

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station- Keshkal, DistrictKondagaon, (C.G.) ... Respondent

¶17

For Applicants : Mr. Asseem Bhagwat Gopal, Advocate For Respondent/State : Dr. Sourabh Pande, Dy. A.G.

¶18

Digitally signed by JYOTI JHA Date: 2026.09.17 14:47:32 +0530

¶19

Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

¶20

Order on Board

¶21

16.09.2026

¶22

1. The applicants have preferred this First Bail Applications under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as they have been

¶23

¶24

arrested in connection with Crime No. 24/2026, registered at Police Station Keshkal, District Kondagaon (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 296, 109, 55 and 3(5) of BNS.

¶25

2. Learned counsel for the applicants would submit that the medical condition of the present applicants is not proper. He would submit that the applicant-Kishun Sinha is suffering from heart disease and, therefore, he has been transferred from Central Jail, Jagdalpur to Central Jail, Raipur. The applicant-Sundar Lal Sinha is suffering from serious physical ailments and pain. He would pray that the present applications be dismissed as withdrawn with a direction to the State authorities to take proper care of the present applicants.

¶26

3. At this stage, Dr. Sourabh Pande, learned Dy. A.G. appearing for the State, would submit that all the facilities would be provided to the present applicants in accordance with the jail manual.

¶27

4. Accordingly, the present bail applications are dismissed as withdrawn . However, the State authorities are directed to take proper care of these applicants strictly in accordance with law. The Medical Officers and the Jail authorities would submit the medical progress report of the present applicants before the concerned Trial Court from time to time.

¶28

Sd/-

¶29

(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge

¶30

Jyoti

Sundarlal Sinha v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sundarlal Sinha v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases