Bail rejected under Section 483 BNSS for applicant accused of homicide and wounding with a knife resulting in death, citing gravity of charges and nature of allegations.
Bail application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2026.09.17 11:17:25 +0530
CGHC010274462026
2026:CGHC:40492
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCRC No. 6622 of 2026
versus
... Non-Applicant
For Applicant : Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Advocate For State : Mr. Dharmesh Shrivastava, Dy. Advocate General
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board
16.09.2026
2
Sonu to the hospital, where he succumbed to death. On the basis of the report lodged by the complainant on 22.08.2025, aforesaid offences were registered against the applicant and his father Sudhakar.
3
of prosecution, but the credibility of their statements can be considered by the learned Trial Court during course of trial. At this stage, a detailed appreciation of the evidence is not permissible.
Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE
$iddhant
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to an applicant charged with homicide and armed violence offenses.
Whether the gravity of the allegations justifies the rejection of bail at the trial stage.
Dhanshri Mahure @ Dhanna
State Of Chhattisgarh
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
