The High Court dismissed a bail application for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear in both hearings despite two calls.
Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CGHC010274592026
2026:CGHC:40620
NAFR
Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.09.1719:51:56 +0530 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCRC No. 6606 of 2026
*** -** Sohail Rana S/o Umed Rana Aged About 19 Years R/o Vill. Gurjarpur, P.S. Kandla, District Shyamli (U.P.) (Permanent Address), Presently R/o Hirapur, Near Gurdwara, Hirapur, P.S. Kabir Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) (As Per Details Mentioned In Impugned Order)
Versus
*** -** State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer (S.H.O) P.S.Aamanaka, District Raipur (C.G.)
... Non-Applicant For Applicant : None appeared even in two rounds For Non-Applicant : Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Govt. Advocate
Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board
17/09/2026
Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
vatti
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application under Section 483 BNSS should be decided in the absence of the applicant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sohail Rana
State Of Chhattisgarh
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
