Ranjit Purena v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
An application for regular bail under Section 483 BNSS was dismissed as withdrawn by the applicant without objection.
An application for regular bail under Section 483 BNSS was dismissed as withdrawn by the applicant without objection.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CGHC010200002026
2026:CGHC:39939
Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.09.1118:46:13 +0530 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
NAFR
MCRC No. 4746 of 2026
*** -** Ranjit Purena S/o Aagar Das Purena Aged About 28 Years R/o Madwa, Police Station Gidhouri-Tundra, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.
Versus
*** -** State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Police Station Gidhouri-Tundra (Chowki Giraudpuri) District Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.
... Non-Applicant
For Applicant : Mr. Pragalbha Sharma, Advocate For Non-Applicant : Mr. Himanshu Yadu, Panel Lawyer
Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board
11/09/2026
Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
vatti
Ranjit Purena
State Of Chhattisgarh
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court