Allowed¶21

Awadh Kishore v. Harjeet Singh

Chhattisgarh HC6 Jan 2026MCC/999/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur (Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey, 7.1.2026) allows MCC No. 999 of 2025 filed by Awadh Kishore and restores WP227 No. 660 of 2024, earlier dismissed for want of prosecution on 10.9.2025, to its original number, conditioned on payment of Rs. 1,000/- cost to the Library Fund, High Court Bar Association, Bilaspur; non-applicant Harjeet Singh had opposed the restoration.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of WP227 No. 660 of 2024 to its original number, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 1,000/- payable to the Library Fund, High Court Bar Association, Bilaspur. ¶21

Awadh Kishore Vs Harjeet Singh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2026.01.07 14:13:11 +0530

¶3

2026:CGHC:862

¶4

NAFR

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

MCC No. 999 of 2025

¶7

Awadh Kishore S/o Late Devki Mistry Aged About 54 Years R/o Q.No. 200, Basant Vihar Colony, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶8

...Applicant

¶9

versus

¶10

Harjeet Singh S/o Lt. Guru Bachan Singh Aged About 66 Years R/o L-10 Vinoba Nagar Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶11

... Non-applicant

¶12

For Applicant	:	Mr. Soumya Rai, Advocate along with
		Ms. Priyanshi Keshari, Advocate
For Non-applicant	:	Mr. VijayK. Deshmukh, Advocate

¶13

Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

¶14

Order On Board

¶15

7.1.2026

¶16

1) Learned counsel for the applicant submits that WP227 No. 660 of 2024 was dismissed by this Court for want of prosecution vide order dated 10.9.2025. He further submits that applicant is very much interested in pursuing the matter and has a good case on

¶17

¶18

merit. He prays to allow the instant application.

¶19

2) On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of nonapplicant opposes.

¶20

3) Heard.

¶21

4) Taking into consideration the submission made by Mr. Rai, instant application is allowed and WP227 No. 660 of 2024 is hereby restored to its original number, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 1,000/- payable to Library Fund, High Court Bar Association,

¶22

Bilaspur.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

Rakesh Mohan Pandey JUDGE

¶25

A j i n k y a

Awadh Kishore v. Harjeet Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Awadh Kishore v. Harjeet Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kulwant Chawla Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Harish Chandra Nishad Vs Shri Tikeshwar

Branch Manager Vs Smt. Manki Mandavi

Cholamandlam General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Mrs. Anita Netam

Smt. Jamuna Bai Vs Nohar Lal Yadav @ Nohan Lal Yadav

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs Fanesh Pal