Allowed

K. N. Fuljhele v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC17 Sept 2026MCC/826/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge Order dispensing with reasons for granting a much sought order. An application for the restoration of a dismissed public interest litigation/matter to its original number. Allowed by the Court which held that the instant application was allowed as the applicant had explained unavoidable circumstances and expressed interest in pursuing the matter.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of WPS No. 7080 of 2021 to its original number. The instant MCC disposed of accordingly.

K. N. Fuljhele Vs State of Chhatti… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Chhattisgarh HC (2026)

CGHC010310442026

2026:CGHC:40740

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

MCC No. 826 of 2026

¶7

K. N. Fuljhele S/o Late Shri Sundar Lal Fuljhele, Aged About 64 Years Retd. Deputy Director (Industry), Presently Residing At Qtr. No. 5-B, Street-1, Sector-9, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh.

... Applicant(s)

versus

KUNAL DEWANGAN

Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN

¶12

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Industry Department Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶13

2 - Director, Industry, Udhog Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶14

3 - Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶15

	... Respondent(s)
For Applicant(s)	: Mr. Rishabhdev, Advocate.
For Respondents/State	: Ms. Priya Sharma, Panel Lawyer.

¶16

Hon'ble Mr. Rakesh Mohan Pandey, Judge

Order on Board

18.09.2026

1. The present application has been moved for restoration of WPS No. 7080 of 2021 which was dismissed for want of prosecution on 20.04.2026.

¶21

2. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that on account of some unavoidable circumstances, no one could appear before this Court when the matter was taken up for hearing, therefore, WPS No. 7080 of 2021 was dismissed for want of prosecution. He would submit that the applicant is interested in pursuing the matter. He would pray to restore the petition to its original number.

¶22

3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State would oppose.

¶23

4. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the applicant, the instant MCC for restoration of WPS No. 7080 of 2021 is hereby allowed. The WPS No. 7080 of 2021 is restored to its original number.

¶24

5. Accordingly, the instant MCC is hereby disposed of.

¶25

Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge

¶26

Kunal

K. N. Fuljhele v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K. N. Fuljhele v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases