Allowed

Daga Metal Agency v. Durga Prasad Varma

Chhattisgarh HC27 Jan 2026MCC/79/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant sought restoration of F.A. No. 19 of 2008, dismissed in default. Court allowed the restoration application, restored the appeal to its original number subject to payment of Rs. 5000 to the High Court Legal Aid Services Committee.

What did the court decide?

F.A. No. 19 of 2008 restored to its original number, subject to payment of Rs. 5000/- to the High Court Legal Aid Services Committee.

Daga Metal Agency Vs Durga Prasad Varma — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Chhattisgarh HC (2026)

2026:CGHC:4665

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

MCC No. 79 of 2026

¶6

Daga Metal Agency, Raipur through Proprietor Sharad Daga, aged about 50 years (At present near about 70 years), S/o Shri Punam Chand Daga, Digitally signedby RAVVA UTTEJ occupation Utensils business, R/o Budapara Raipur, Tahsil and DistrictKUMAR RAJU Raipur (C.G.)

¶7

... Applicant

¶8

Versus

¶9

1 - Durga Prasad Varma S/o Tika Ram Kasar, aged about 77 years, utensil business, R/o Polsai Para, P.S. Durg, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.).

¶10

2 - Kamta Prasad S/o Durga Prasad Kasar, aged about 54 years, utensil business, R/o Polsai Para, P.S. Durg, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.).

¶11

3 - Dhanna Lal Verma S/o Durga Prasad Kasar, aged about 46 years, utensil business, R/o Polsai Para, P.S. Durg, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.).

¶12

4 - Purushottam Das S/o Durga Prasad Kasar, aged about 42 years, utensil business, R/o Polsai Para, P.S. Durg, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.).

¶13

5 - Mukesh Kumar Verma S/o Durga Prasad Kasar, aged about 38 years, utensil business, R/o Polsai Para, P.S. Durg, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.).

¶14

6 - Santosh Kumar S/o Durga Prasad Kasar, aged about 32 years, utensil business, R/o Polsai Para, P.S. Durg, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.).

¶15

¶16

7 - Pradeep Kumar Daga S/o Punamchand Daga, aged about 36 years, utensil business, R/o Budapara Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.)

¶17

... Respondents

¶18

(Cause title is taken from Case Information System Software)

¶19

For Applicant	: Mr. Aditya Dhar Diwan, Advocate.
For Respondents	: Mr. Amit Naik, Counsel on behalf of Mr.
	Avinash Chand Sahu, Advocate.

¶20

Hon’ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey,J. Order on Board

¶21

28.01.2026

¶22

The present MCC has been filed seeking restoration of F.A. No. 19 of 2008 which was dismissed in default on 20.03.2024 by this Court.

¶23

Considering the reasons assigned therein and submissions made by counsel for the Applicant, present MCC which is duly supported by an affidavit, deserves to be and is accordingly allowed and F.A. No. 19 of 2008 stands restored to its original number, subject to payment of Rs. 5000/- to the High Court Legal Aid Services Committee.

¶24

Accordingly, the instant MCC stands disposed of.

Sd/-

(Rajani Dubey)

Judge

U.K. Raju

Daga Metal Agency v. Durga Prasad Varma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Daga Metal Agency v. Durga Prasad Varma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shailendra @ Santosh Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Bhaklu and Ors. Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Jeevanlal Bhariya Vs Pushpendra Sharma

Jai Singh (Formerly Known as Jeevan Lal Barman) Vs Rajendra Kumar Anchal

Rajkumar Yadav Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Harlal Prasad Sahu Vs Rajendra Kumar Verma