Kripa Ram Sahu Vs Mintaram Sahu (Since Deceased) through LRs

1.1 - Smt. Sushila Bai Wd/o Late Mintaram Shu Aged About 62 Years R/o Bidora, Post, Bakma, P.S. Komakhan, Tahsil Bagbahera, Distt. Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

¶11

Digitally signed bySHOAIB SHOAIB ANWAR ANWAR Date:2026.06.19 14:19:02 +0530

¶12

1.2 - Khamesh Sahu S/o Late Mintaram Sahu Aged About 40 Years R/o Bidora, Post, Bakma, P.S. Komakhan, Tahsil Bagbahera, Distt. Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

¶13

1.3 - Bhuvneshwar Sahu S/o Late Mintaram Sahu Aged About 29 Years R/o Bidora, Post, Bakma, P.S. Komakhan, Tahsil Bagbahera, Distt. Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

¶14

1.4 - Hemlal Sahu S/o Late Mintaram Sahu Aged About 27 Years R/o Bidora, Post, Bakma, P.S. Komakhan, Tahsil Bagbahera, Distt. Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

¶15

1.5 - Smt. Bhuneshwari D/o Late Mintaram Sahu Aged About 32 Years W/o Rameshwar Yadav, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village And P.S. Khallari, Tahsil Bagbahera, Distt. Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

¶16

2

¶17

1.6 - Nirmala Bai D/o Mintaram Sahu Aged About 38 Years W/o Kailash Sahu, R/o Village And Post Sarabong, Tahsil And Distt. Naupada (Odisha) (Wrongly Typed Orissa In Cause Title)

¶18

2 - Gopal Prasad Sen (Since Deceased) Through Lrs Nil

¶19

2.1 - Deleted Nil

¶20

2.2 - Ramu Kaushik S/o Gopal Prasad Sen Aged About 30 Years R/o Nagar Naka Chowk, Ratan Colony, Ward No. 32, Dhamtari, Tahsil And P.S. And Distt. Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.

¶21

2.3 - Ankit Kaushik S/o Late Gopal Prasad Sen Aged About 25 Years R/o Nagar Naka Chowk, Ratan Colony, Ward No. 32, Dhamtari, Tahsil And P.S. And Distt. Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.

¶22

2.4 - Shrawan Kaushik S/o Late Gopal Prasad Sen Aged About 25 Years R/o Nagar Naka Chowk, Ratan Colony, Ward No. 32, Dhamtari, Tahsil And P.S. And Distt. Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.

¶23

3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Mahasamund, Distt. Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

¶24

... Respondent(s)

¶25

(Cause title taken from CIS)

¶26

For Applicant : Shri Keshav Dewangan, Advocate
For Respondent No. 1 & 2 : Shri Sandeep Patel, Advocate
For Respondent/State : Shri Jitendra Shrivastava, Govt. Advocate with Shri Kanhaiya Ram
Yadav,Panel Lawyer

¶27

3

¶28

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey, J

¶29

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru, J

¶30

Order on Board

¶31

Per Rajani Dubey, J

¶32

19.06.2026

¶33

Heard on I.A. No. 01 of 2026 i.e. application for condonation of delay in f i ling the restoration application.

¶34

On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the application, I.A. No. 01/2026 is allowed. Delay in flling the i restoration application is condoned.

¶35

This MCC has been f i led for restoration of FA No. 103/2020, which was dismissed by peremptory order by this Court vide order dated 17.12.2024.

¶36

learned counsel for the respondents does not raise any objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶37

On due consideration and pleadings made in the application for restoration, the MCC is allowed and FA No. 103/2020 stands restored to its original number subject to payment of cost of Rs. 3,000/- before the Chhattisgarh High Court Bar Association Library Fund.

¶38

Sd/- Sd/-

¶39

(Rajani Dubey) (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Judge

¶40

Shoaib

Kripa Ram Sahu v. Mintaram Sahu (Since Deceased) through LRs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kripa Ram Sahu v. Mintaram Sahu (Since Deceased) through LRs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

U. Chandrashekhar Vs Smt. Sarita

Smt. Premlata Vaishnav Vs Sunil Vaishnav

Kripa Ram Sahu Vs Praveen Kumar Sahu

Videsh Kumar Vs Smt. Saroj

Praveen Kumar Mishra Vs Seetaram Rajak