Allowed¶31

Smt. Reena Singh v. Tarsem Singh

Chhattisgarh HC16 Apr 2026MCC/370/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Restoration of MAC No. 63/2017; dismissal for non-prosecution on 29.08.2025; condonation of delay I.A. No. 01/2026; MCC No. 370 of 2026; High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; Radhakishan Agrawal J.; order dated 17/04/2026; motor accident claim restoration; minor applicants through guardian mother; insurer unrepresented; offending truck PB/02/BC/9587.

What did the court decide?

Delay in filing the MCC condoned; MAC No. 63/2017 restored to its original number; MCC disposed of accordingly. ¶31

Smt. Reena Singh Vs Tarsem Singh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

2026:CGHC:17615

¶3

Digitally signed by PRIYANKA PRIYANKA VERMA VERMA Date: 2026.04.17 15:34:55 +0530

¶4

NAFR

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

MCC No. 370 of 2026

¶7

Smt. Reena Singh W/o Late Pawan Kumar Aged About 33 Years

¶8

Aditya Raj S/o Late Pawan Kumar Aged About 5 Years

¶9

Akansha D/o Late Pawan Kumar Aged About 5 Years

¶10

Smt. Shivrani Devi W/o Shri Rajkumar Singh Aged About 55 Years

¶11

Rajkumar Singh S/o Late Bhagwat Singh Aged About 60 Years Appellants No.2 & 3 are minor through Legal Guardian Mother Smt. Reena Singh Appellant No.1

¶12

All Present Address - Jarhi, Thana And Tehsil - Bhatgaon, District - Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

¶13

Permanent Address - R/o Village Dhareya, Thana - Vajirgunj, District - Gaya Bihar

¶14

... Applicant

¶15

versus

¶16

Tarsem Singh S/o S. Pal Singh Aged About 48 Years R/o Mehta Chowk, Tahsil - Baba Bakala, District Amritsara (Punjab) (Driver Of Offending Truck No. P B/02/BC/9587)

¶17

Dilbag Singh S/o S Pal Singh R/o Mehta Chowk, Tahsil - Baba Bakala, District - Amritsar (Punjab), (Owner Of Offending Truck No. PB/02/BC/9587)

¶18

Branch Manager The India Assurance Company Limited, Branch Office - Ambedkar Chowk, Near Ambika Petrol Pump, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh (Insurer Of Offending Truck No. PB/02/BC/9587)

¶19

... Respondents

¶20

For Applicants : Mr. Sangeet Kumar Kushwaha, Advocate For Respondents No.1 & 2 : Ms. Anushka Tripathi, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Siddharth Pandey, Advocate

¶21

¶22

For Respondent No.3 : None

¶23

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

¶24

Order on Board

¶25

17/04/2026

¶26

1. Heard on I.A. No. 01/2026, an application for condonation of delay in filing the MCC.

¶27

2. Upon due consideration and for the reasons assigned in the application, the same is allowed and the delay is condoned.

¶28

3. Also heard on the application for restoration of MAC No. 63/2017, which was dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated 29.08.2025.

¶29

4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that when the matter was called for hearing on 29.08.2025, he could not appear before the Court due to personal difficulties, therefore, the matter was dismissed for nonprosecution.

¶30

5. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the MCC for restoration, which is duly supported by an affidavit, it is allowed and MAC No. 63/2017 is restored to its original number.

¶31

6. Accordingly, the MCC stands disposed of.

¶32

Sd/-

¶33

(Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge

¶34

Priyanka

Smt. Reena Singh v. Tarsem Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Reena Singh v. Tarsem Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandrakala Vs Avinash Khandela

Moulana Jahiruddin Khan Vs Manmohan Shukla

M. Javed Akhatar Vs Rana Biswash

Jitendra Kumar Jaiswal Vs Govind Soni

Manager, Branch Office National Insurance Company Limited Vs Smt. Amrika Bai Sarthi

Lokesh Kumar Soni Vs Afroz Sheikh