Vidyasagar Vikram Singh v. Smt. Sushitma
Case brief
What is this about?
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR…
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2026:CGHC:16759
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCC No. 348 of 2026
Vidyasagar Vikram Singh S/o Shri Manrakhan Deshlahra Aged About 34 Years R/o Village- Marra Patan P.S. And Tahsil Patan Distt- Durg (C.G.)
... Applicant(s)
versus
Smt. Sushitma D/o Late Shri Sonechand Daharia Aged About 29 Years Assistant Teacher (L.B) R/o Village Kagdehi Post Samoda P.S. And Tahsil Arang Distt- Raipur (C.G.) Present Address- C/o Jagat Khandelwal S/o Bhukhau Khandelwal Village Bahnakadi Post- Kurud Camp P.S. Mandir Masoud Block- Arang Distt- Raipur (C.G.) Officer Address- Government Primary School Junwani Block- Palari Distt- Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara (C.G.)
... Respondent
For Applicant : Mr. Tushar Dhar Diwan, Advocate. Hon’ble Shri Sachin Singh Rajput, Judge Order on Board
10/04/2026
1. This MCC has been filed for modification/correction in the order dated 10.03.2026 passed in writ petition bearing W.P. (227) No. 277 of 2026.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that due to inadvertence, the the family court case number has been wrongly mentioned as “321/2021” instead of “312/2021” in the order dated 10.03.2026 passed in W.P. (227) No. 277 of 2026, therefore prays for appropriate modification.
3. Accordingly, the order dated 10.03.2026 passed in W.P. (227) No. 277 of 2026 shall stand modified to the extent that the case number mentioned as “321/2021” shall be read as “312/2021”.
4. With the aforesaid correction, the present MCC stands disposed of.
Jyoti
Vidyasagar Vikram Singh
Smt. Sushitma Daharia
Sachin Singh Rajput
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court