Dismissed¶5

Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, v. Ramrijhawan Das

Chhattisgarh HC21 Jul 2026MCC/1009/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Shriram General Insurance Company Limited v. Ramrijhawan Das (Claimant, through Amicus Smt. Santoshi Das), Shobhlal Yadav (Owner) and Rohit Kumar Dewangan (Driver); MCC No. 1009 of 2024; High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; condonation of 240 days' delay; application for restoration of appeal arising from MAC No.1170/2020 (motor accident claim) dismissed in default on 27.03.2023; insufficient cause; I.A. No. 1/2023 rejected; MCC dismissed; decided 22/07/2026.

What did the court decide?

No sufficient cause was shown for the delay of 240 days in filing the present MCC; the Court was therefore not inclined to condone the delay. ¶3

Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, Vs Ramrijhawan Das — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

CGHC010357872023

2026:CGHC:31144

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

MCC No. 1009 of 2024

¶7

Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, Through Branch Manager, E-8, Riico Industrial Area, Sitapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶8

... Petitioner.

¶9

Versus

¶10

Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI DN: cn=AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ou=HIGH COURT, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN Date: 2026.07.23 10:25:48 +0530

¶11

1 - Ramrijhawan Das S/o Late Shri Laxman Das, Aged About 38 Years CastePanika, R/o Mahuapara, Ward No. 15, Surajpur, Thana, Tehsil And DistrictSurajpur (C.G.) Through Amicus Smt. Santoshi Das W/o Shri Ramrijhawan Das, Aged About 35 Years, Caste Panika, R/o Mahuapara, Ward No. 15, Surajpur, Thana, Tehsil And District-Surajpur (C.G.) -----(Claimant)

¶12

2 - Shobhlal Yadav S/o Shri Sunderlal Yadav, Caste Aheer, R/o Gayatri Mandir Road, In Front Of Kasturbha Gandhi Girls Residential School, Surajpur, District-Surajpur (C.G.) ------(Owner)

¶13

3 - Rohit Kumar Dewangan S/o Ramcharan Dewangan, Aged About 23 Years R/o Village-Chanderpur, Post, Thana, Tehsil And District- Surajpur (C.G.) ----(Driver)

¶14

... Respondents.

¶15

For Appellant	: Mr. Utsav Mahiswar, Advocate.
For Res No.2	: Ms. Srishtee Sahu, Adv on behalf of Mr. Sufaraj Khan.

¶16

(Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)

Order on Board

22/07/2026

Heard on application for condonation of delay in filing the application for restoration (IA No.01/2023).

¶21

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that in the original case, bearing MAC No.1170/2020, the certified copy of the impugned award could not be received, due to which the default could not be removed within the time stipulated by this Court on 17.01.2023, resulting in the appeal being dismissed on 27.03.2023. He submits that the delay of 240 days in filing the present MCC is bona fide and not willful, and prays for condonation of the delay.

¶22

Upon due consideration, and perusing the contents of the application for condonation of delay, no sufficient cause has been shown for the delay of 240 days in filing the present MCC. therefore, this Court is not inclined to condone the delay in filing the instant MCC.

¶23

Accordingly, the application (I.A. No. 1/2023) is rejected.

¶24

Consequently, this MCC stands dismissed.

¶25

Sd/(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge

¶26

Ajay

Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, v. Ramrijhawan Das

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, v. Ramrijhawan Das

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Farhana Bi Vs Israr Mohammad

Mrs. Sunita Yadav Vs Mrs. Panchbati Bai Yadav

Bhagirathi Tamrakar Vs Bhi. Maheshwar Rao

State of Chhattisgarh Vs Mayank Pratap Sahu

Smt. Laxmi Rao Dongre Vs Paras Ramtekey

Yashwant Raj Singh Vs Bhognath