Anoj Kujur v. Dharamdas Annu Sahu
Case brief
What is this about?
Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; MAC No. 354 of 2020; dismissed for want of prosecution; counsel pleaded no instruction; appellants/claimants Anoj Kujur, Lalita, Baby Aysha Bada (minor); respondents Dharamdas Annu Sahu (owner), Chatan Nayaran Ghosle (driver), Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited (insurer); vehicle C.G.-15-D.A.-4803; advocates Sharda Prasad, Rahul Mishra, Sangeet Kumar Kushwaha; Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.; decided 16.04.2026; no ratio on liability or quantum.
What did the court decide?
As learned counsel appearing for the appellants pleaded no instruction, the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution. ¶26