Dismissed

Seema Soni v. Sanjeev Kumar Yadav

Chhattisgarh HC17 Sept 2026MAC/2109/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The claimants appealed to the High Court of Chhattisgarh seeking enhancement of compensation of Rs. 36,27,560 awarded by the First Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Katghora. Their own counsel submitted that the impugned award was just, reasonable and proper and no interference was required. Accepting this submission, the court dismissed the appeal at the admission stage.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed at admission stage; delay of 35 days condoned.

Seema Soni Vs Sanjeev Kumar Yadav — Motor Accident Claims | Chhattisgarh HC (2026)

CGHC010348962026

2026:CGHC:40751

NAFR

PRASHANT DEWANGAN

Digitally signed by PRASHANT DEWANGAN Date: 2026.09.22 11:44:13 +0530

¶7

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶8

MAC No. 2109 of 2026

¶9

1 - Seema Soni, Wd/o - Deepak Lal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o - Village - Dagniyakhar, Balgi Pariyojna, Ward No. 46, Korba, Presently Residing At Pali, P.S. And Tehsil - Pali, Dist. - Korba (C.G.) (Claimants)

¶10

2 - Aayush S/o- Deepak Lal Aged About 8 Years (Minor) Hence They Are Represented Through Their Mother A-1, R/o - Village - Dagniyakhar, Balgi Pariyojna, Ward No. 46, Korba, Presently Residing At Pali, P.S. And Tehsil - Pali, Dist. - Korba (C.G.) (Claimants)

¶11

3 - Anshika D/o- Deepak Lal Aged About 3 Years, (Minor) Hence They Are Represented Through Their Mother A-1, R/o - Village - Dagniyakhar, Balgi Pariyojna, Ward No. 46, Korba, Presently Residing At Pali, P.S. And Tehsil - Pali, Dist. - Korba (C.G.) (Claimants)

¶12

4 - Babli W/o – Dorelal, Aged About 52 Years, R/o - Village - Dagniyakhar, Balgi Pariyojna, Ward No. 46, Korba, Presently Residing At Pali, P.S. And Tehsil - Pali, Dist. - Korba (C.G.) (Claimants)

¶13

5 - Dorelal Soni, S/o- Harihar Saay, Aged About 55 Years, R/o - Village - Dagniyakhar, Balgi Pariyojna, Ward No. 46, Korba, Presently Residing At Pali, P.S. And Tehsil - Pali, Dist. - Korba (C.G.) (Claimants)

¶14

... Appellants

¶15

versus

¶16

1 - Sanjeev Kumar Yadav, S/o - Lalbihari Singh Yadav, Aged About 36 Years, R/o - C/o - Smt. Soni Mishra, W/o - Shri Manish Mishra, R/o - M.I.G. 1184, Veer Savarkar Nagar, Hirapur, Tatibandh, Raipur (C.G.) (Driver)

¶17

2 - Smt. Soni Mishra W/o- Shri Manish Mishra R/o - M.I.G. 1184, Veer Savarkar Nagar, Hirapur, Tatibandh, Raipur (C.G.) (Owner Of Vehicle C.G.04-M.R-1677)

¶18

3 - United India Insurance Company Limited Through Its Branch Manager, Office At T.P. Nagar Korba, Dist. - Korba (C.G.) (Insurer)

¶19

		... Respondents
For Appellants	: Mr. Pallav Mishra, Advocate
For Respondents	: None

¶20

¶21

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal, J. Order on Board

¶22

( 18/09/2026)

¶23

Heard on I.A. No.01/2026, an application for condonation of delay in preferring of this appeal.

¶24

The present appeal has been preferred by the appellants/claimants seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded by the learned Claims Tribunal.

¶25

For the reasons assigned therein, I am inclined to allow the same and delay of 35 days in preferring of this appeal is, hereby, condoned.

¶26

I.A. No.01/2026, thus, stands disposed of.

¶27

Heard on admission.

¶28

This is the claimants’ appeal for enhancement against the award dated 28/04/2026 passed by the learned First Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Katghora, District- Korba (C.G.) in Motor Accident claim case No. 05/2025 whereby a compensation amount of Rs. 36,27,560/- has been awarded in favour of the claimants.

¶29

Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the impugned award passed by the learned Claims Tribunal is just reasonable and proper and no interference is required in the impugned award.

¶30

In view of the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for the appellants, the appeal is hereby dismissed at the admission stage.

¶31

Sd/Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Judge

¶32

Prashant

Seema Soni v. Sanjeev Kumar Yadav

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Seema Soni v. Sanjeev Kumar Yadav

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases