Disposed¶26

Rmeshwari v. Harish Kumar Vaishnav

Chhattisgarh HC13 Mar 2026MAC/2049/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

MAC No. 2049 of 2025, High Court of Chhattisgarh (Bilaspur), National Lok Adalat award dated 14/03/2026; motor accident claimants family of Late Santosh Satnami; offending vehicle motorcycle No. C.G. 23/k/6608; insurer Chola Mandalam M.S. General Insurance Company Limited agreed to pay additional Rs. 3,00,000/- within 60 days; compromise permitted, matter disposed; Claims Tribunal conditions remain intact.

What did the court decide?

Compromise permitted; Respondent No.2/Insurance Company to pay additional amount of Rs. 3,00,000/- within 60 days; docket made part of the record; copies of the docket and the award to be sent to the Claims Tribunal, whose imposed conditions remain intact. ¶26

Rmeshwari Vs Harish Kumar Vaishnav — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:12333

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

NATIONAL LOK ADALAT

¶6

AVINASH SHARMA

¶7

Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.03.18 14:24:01 +0530

¶8

Judge - Lok Adalat : Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Member - Lok Adalat : Mr. Apoorva Tripathi, Advocate.

¶9

MAC No. 2049 of 2025

¶10

1 - Rmeshwari W/o Late Santosh Satnami Aged About 33 Years.

¶11

2 - Ku. Sangeeta D/o Late Santosh Satnami Aged About 19 Years.

¶12

3 - Minor Ku. Meena D/o Late Santosh Satnami Aged About 12 Years. 4 - Falesh Kumar S/o Late Santosh Satnami Aged About 8 Years.

¶13

Appellant 3 To 4 Minor Through Legal Guardian Mother Rmeshwari Bai. All are R/o Village Sivni Post Kharkhara Thana Chhura District - Gariyaband (C.G.)

¶14

... Appellants/Claimants.

¶15

versus

¶16

1 - Harish Kumar Vaishnav S/o Nilkamal Vaishnav Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Santohsi Para, Gariyaband Thana Gariyaband Tahsil Gariyaband DistrictGariyaband (C.G.) (Owner Cum Driver Of The Offending Vehicle Motor Cycle No. C.G. 23/k/6608) (Driver )

¶17

2 - Branch Manager Chola Mandalam M.S. General Insurance Company Limited 2nd Floor Simran Tower In Front Of L.I.C. Building Pandri Raipur Tahsil And

¶18

¶19

District - Raipur (C.G.) (Insurer Of The Offending Vehicle Motor Cycle No. C.G. 23/k/6608) (Insurer )

¶20

... Respondent(s)

¶21

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)

¶22

For Appellants	: Ms. Shaleeni Jangde appears on behalf of Shri AL Singroul, Advocates.
For Respondent No.2	: Ms. Priya Kaiwart appears on behalf of Shri
	Sangeet Kumar Kushwaha, Advocates.

¶23

AWARD

¶24

(Passed on 14/03/2026)

¶25

The Parties have filed a docket/compromise petition stating therein that Respondent/Insurance Company has agreed to pay additional amount of Rs. 3,00,000/- (Three Lakhs only) within a period of 60 days from today. The docket is duly filled-in and signed by both the parties.

¶26

The compromise sought for by the parties is permitted and the matter in hand stands disposed of.

¶27

The docket be made part of this record.

¶28

A copy of the compromise arrived at between the parties (docket) be sent to the Claims Tribunal along with its record, if any, and a copy of the award passed today, forthwith. Conditions imposed by the Claims Tribunal will remain intact.

¶29

Sd/Sd/-

¶30

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) (Apoorva Tripathi) Judge - Lok Adalat Member - Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh

¶31

Avinash

Rmeshwari v. Harish Kumar Vaishnav

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rmeshwari v. Harish Kumar Vaishnav

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahesh Yadav Vs Ganeshuram

Ramesh Prasad Rathore Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shri Dilip Kumar Yadav Vs the Asst. Commissioner Tribal Development

Sahas Das Mahant Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Aditya Yadav Vs Priyanshu Tiwari

Gram Panchayat Barduli, Vs State of Chhattisgarh