Disposed¶23

Smt. Sunita Kaushik v. Smt. Sulochna Kale

Chhattisgarh HC7 Jul 2026MA/91/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; MA No. 91 of 2022; Smt. Sunita Kaushik (appellant/Defendant No. 2) v. Smt. Sulochna Kale (Plaintiff), Sanjay Kale and State of Chhattisgarh; Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi; order dated 8-7-2026; miscellaneous appeal disposed of as withdrawn; direction to District Judge/trial Court for expeditious decision of Civil Suit No. (A)/173/2021 within a preferred period of 3 months from receipt of certified copy; parties directed to cooperate; no adjudication on merits.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the appeal granted; appeal disposed of as withdrawn; trial Court directed to decide Civil Suit No. (A)/173/2021 as early as possible, preferably within 3 months of receipt of certified copy of the order; both parties directed to cooperate with the trial Court. ¶23

Smt. Sunita Kaushik Vs Smt. Sulochna Kale — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

CGHC010280592022

2026:CGHC:28205

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

MA No. 91 of 2022

¶7

Smt. Sunita Kaushik W/o Suresh Kumar Kaushik Aged About 47 Years Near Gudi Chowk, Nagpura Tahsil Bilha District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. (Defendant No. 2)

¶8

... Appellant

¶9

versus

¶10

1 - Smt. Sulochna Kale W/o Late Shri G.P. Kale, Aged About 81 Years R/o Jarhabahata, Balram Talkies Road, Opp, Tulsi Kunj, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. (Plaintiff)

¶11

2 - Sanjay Kale S/o Late Shri Bitthal Rao Kale Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Palora Chouras, Tahsil Pawni, District Bhandara (M.S.)

¶12

3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

¶13

... Respondent(s)

¶14

For appellant : Mr. B.P. Gupta, Adv. For respondents No. 1 : Mr. Vaibhav Mittal, Adv. on behalf of Mrs. Renu Kochar, Adv. For respondent No. 3 : Mr. D.R. Minj, Dy. Adv. General.

¶15

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

¶16

Order On Board

¶17

8-7-2026

¶18

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that, concerned Civil Suit No. (A)/173/2021 pending before the concerned District Judge is on the verge of conclusion. Hence, he prays that, he may be permitted to

¶19

¶20

withdraw this appeal and learned trial Court be directed to decide the same expeditiously.

¶21

In view of above submission, this appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. However, the trial Court is directed to decide the Civil Suit No. (A)/173/2021 (Smt. Sulochana Kale Vs. Sanjay Kale and ors.) as early as possible preferably within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

¶22