Disposed¶22

Smt. Ninni Jangde v. Shri Doman Jangde

Chhattisgarh HC12 Jan 2026FA(MAT)/91/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; FA(MAT) No. 91 of 2025; neutral citation 2026:CGHC:1867-DB; decision dated 13.01.2026; Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. (author) with Arvind Kumar Verma, J.; appeal against Family Court, Mungeli order dated 16.01.2025 in Civil Suit no. 29A/2024 allowing respondent/plaintiff's application under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act; disposal by mediation compromise dated 04.09.2025; demand draft of Rs. 5,00,000/- paid by respondent to appellant and accepted; decree to be drawn; no cost; appellant Ninni Jangde (counsel Pritendra Chauhan); respondent Doman Jangde (counsel T. R. Patel).

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed of in terms and conditions of the mediation report/compromise dated 04.09.2025; decree to be drawn accordingly; no cost. ¶22

Smt. Ninni Jangde Vs Shri Doman Jangde — Matrimonial and Divorce | Chhattisgarh HC (2026)

2026:CGHC:1867-DB

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

FA(MAT) No. 91 of 2025

¶6

Smt. Ninni Jangde D/o Shri Premsingh Bhargaw Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Dashrangpur, Police Station Pandatarai, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh, Presently R/o Village Dadgaon, Police Station Pathariya, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

¶7

...Appellant

¶8

versus

¶9

Shri Doman Jangde S/o Shri Santuram Jangde Aged About 33 Years R/o Village Dashrangpur, Police Station Pandatarai, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh

¶10

... Respondent(s)

¶11

For Appellant : Mr. Pritendra Chauhan, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. T. R. Patel, Advocate

¶12

Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

¶13

Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma

¶14

Judgment on Board

¶15

(13.01.2026)

¶16

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.

¶17

This appeal has been preferred against the impugned order dated 16.01.2025 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Mungeli, District- Mungeli, C.G. in the Civil Suit no. 29A/2024 whereby the

¶18

¶19

application preferred by the respondent/plaintiff under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act was allowed.

¶20

Learned counsel for the parties submit that the matter was referred before the mediation center of this Court, the mediation has been successfully completed, and the parties have arrived at a compromise on 04.09.2025 on certain terms and conditions.

¶21

Accordingly, the mediation report is taken on record. The compromise between the parties dated 04.09.2025 is being made part of this order. In terms of the mediation report, the respondent in-person has given a demand draft bearing no. 061102 000002000 000546 16 of Rs. 5,00,000/- to the appellant in-person which has been accepted by the appellant in-person.

¶22

In that view of the matter, the FA(MAT) No. 91/20225 is disposed of in terms and conditions of the mediation report dated 04.09.2025. No cost.

¶23

Decree be drawn accordingly.

¶24

Sd/- Sd/(Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE JUDGE

¶25

Madhurima

Smt. Ninni Jangde v. Shri Doman Jangde

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Ninni Jangde v. Shri Doman Jangde

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sahinder Pal Singh Bhatia Vs M/S Sanjari Enterprises

Ravi Kumar Prajapati Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Hirachand Panika Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Hemant Kumar Dugga Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Shri Bodhi Ram Sonkar Vs Smt. Mohani Bai Sonkar

Amit Kumar Verma Vs Smt. Apurwa Kashyap