Smt. Nirmala Nayak @ Pushpanjali Nayak v. Chandraprakash Nayak
Case brief
What is this about?
Procedural order sheet dated 05/02/2026 in FA(MAT) No. 268 of 2025, High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, between Smt. Nirmala Nayak @ Pushpanjali Nayak (appellant; counsel R.S. Patel) and Chandraprakash Nayak (respondent; counsel Anil Gulati). Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal and Arvind Kumar Verma, JJ. Two weeks granted to the appellant's counsel to rectify the Registry default, failing which the appeal is to be automatically dismissed without further reference to the Bench and listed thereafter. No statutes, precedents, issues or amounts appear in the order.
What did the court decide?
Two weeks' time to learned counsel for the appellant to rectify the Registry default; failing which the appeal to be dismissed automatically without further reference to the Bench; appeal to be listed thereafter. ¶6