Dismissed¶19

Anita Kiran Lakda v. Pravin Kumar Lakda

Chhattisgarh HC26 Jan 2026FA(MAT)/231/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissed as not pressed; withdrawal of matrimonial appeal; Chhattisgarh High Court Bilaspur; FA(MAT) No. 231 of 2022; neutral citation 2026:CGHC:4368-DB; decided 27.01.2026; bench Sanjay K. Agrawal and Arvind Kumar Verma; Anita Kiran Lakda (wife/appellant) v Pravin Kumar Lakda (husband/respondent); appeal under S.91 Family Court Act read with S.55 Indian Divorce Act; impugned decree dated 10/11/2022 of Family Court, Jashpur in Civil Suit No.17A/2022 granting divorce under S.10 Indian Divorce Act; counsel Rishikant Mahobia for appellant, Anand Kumar Kujur for respondent; no order as to cost(s); no merits adjudicated; NAFR.

What the court decided

Anita Kiran Lakda Vs Pravin Kumar Lakda — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:4368-DB

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

FA(MAT) No. 231 of 2022

¶6

Anita Kiran Lakda W/o Pravin Kumar Lakda Aged About 42 Years Caste - Uroan, R/o Village - Kunkuri, Gorto Line, Tehsil - Kunkuri, District - Jashpur (C.G.) Presently Residing At - Sarangarh, Government Primary School, Gondihari, Sarangarh, Tehsil - Sarangarh, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh

¶7

... Appellant

¶8

versus

¶9

Pravin Kumar Lakda S/o Jerald Lakda Aged About 42 Years Caste - Uraon, R/o - Village - Pathalgaon Tehsil - Pathalgaon, District - Jashpur Chhattisgarh

¶10

	... Respondent
For Appellant	: Mr. Rishikant Mahobia, Advocate
For Respondent	: Mr. Anand Kumar Kujur, Advocate

¶11

DB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Judgment on Board

¶12

27.01.2026

¶13

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.

¶14

Digitally ASHUTOSH signed by MISHRA ASHUTOSH MISHRA

¶15

The instant appeal under Section 91 of the Family Court Act Read with Section 55 of the Indian Divorce Act being

¶16

¶17

aggrieved by the impugned judgment and decree dated 10/11/2022 passed by the Family Court, Jashpur, District Jashpur, C.G. in Civil Suit No.17A/2022 whereby the application filed by the respondent under Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act for a decree of divorce has been allowed.

¶18

At the very outset learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the sole appellant is not interested in prosecuting this appeal.

¶19

In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the appellant, the instant appeal is dismissed as not pressed. No order as to cost(s).

¶20

SD/SD/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE JUDGE

¶21

Ashu

Anita Kiran Lakda v. Pravin Kumar Lakda

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Anita Kiran Lakda v. Pravin Kumar Lakda

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhannu @ Dhanesh Vs Vandana

Mangalu Ram Vs Smt. Gayatri Kharsan

Rajkumar @ Raja Dewangan Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Amit Bhagat @ Pintu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Udayram Basant Vs Smt. Jyoti

Rajendra Kumar Patel Vs State Of Chhattisgarh