Dismissed¶22

Smt. Fagni Bai v. Sitara Begum

Chhattisgarh HC15 Jan 2026CRR/819/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court criminal revision CRR No. 819 of 2017 dismissed for want of prosecution on 16/01/2026 by Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal. Revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against Sessions Judge, Dhamtari order dated 04.07.2017 in Cr.A. No. 34/2017, arising from JMFC, Nagri order dated 28.03.2017 in Criminal Complaint Case No.551/2006. Petitioner absent in second round; no merits adjudicated. Petitioners: Fagni Bai, Beniram, Alok Sinha; Respondents: Sitara Begum, State of Chhattisgarh.

What did the court decide?

The revision is dismissed for want of prosecution, as no one appeared for the petitioner despite repeated calls and the petitioner appeared not interested in pursuing the matter. ¶22

Smt. Fagni Bai Vs Sitara Begum — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

Digitally signed by ALLENA ALLENA ANNAJEE ANNAJEE RAO RAO Date: 2026.01.18 12:41:22 +0530

¶3

2026:CGHC:2761

¶4

NAFR

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

CRR No. 819 of 2017

¶7

1 - Smt. Fagni Bai W/o Late Shri Asthir Ram, Aged About 70 Years R/o Ward No. 2, Jangalpara Nagri, P. S. and Tahsil Nagri, Civil & Revenue District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.

¶8

2 - Beniram S/o Asthir Ram, Aged About 57 Years R/o Bhaismundi, P. S. Magarlod, Civil and Revenue District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.

¶9

3 - Alok Sinha S/o Bhuwan Lal, Aged About 50 Years R/o Ward No. 4, Nagri, P. S. and Tahsil Nagri, Civil and Revenue District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners

¶10

versus

¶11

1 - Sitara Begum W/o Md. Rafiq Musalman, R/o Jangalpara, Nagri, P. S. and Tahsil Nagri, Civil and Revenue District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.,

¶12

2 - State of Chhattisgarh through the District Magistrate, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents

¶13

For the petitioner : None For the State : Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Panel Lawyer For respondent no.1 : Mr. Rahim Ubwani, Advocate

¶14

(Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal)

Order on Board

16/01/2026

This revision has been filed u/s 397, 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the impugned order dated 04.07.2017 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Dhamtari in Cr.A. No. 34/2017 arising out of the order dated 28.03.2017 passed by the JMFC, Nagri, District Dhamtari (C.G) in Criminal Complaint Case No.551/2006.

¶19

No one appears on behalf of the petitioner even when the matter is called out in second round.

¶20

The matter is of the year 2017.

¶21

Since no one appears for the petitioner despite repeated calls, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. Hence, this Court is left with no other way except to dismiss the revision for want of prosecution.

¶22

Accordingly, this revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

(Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge

¶25

Rao

Smt. Fagni Bai v. Sitara Begum

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Fagni Bai v. Sitara Begum

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhuvneshwar Kashyap Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Johit Lal Karsh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sunil Kumar Soman Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Rambai Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Manharan Lal Nirmalkar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Gagan Gupta Vs State of Chhattisgarh