Disposed

Shri. Jijoy Daniel v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC20 Sept 2026CRR/1241/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The applicants sought and were granted permission to withdraw their criminal revision petition with liberty to file an appropriate petition in accordance with law. The State had no objection. The revision was disposed of as withdrawn and pending applications, if any, were also disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Revision petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate petition in accordance with law; pending applications disposed of.

Shri. Jijoy Daniel Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

CGHC010355632026

2026:CGHC:40919

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

CRR No. 1241 of 2026

¶7

1 - Shri. Jijoy Daniel S/o Shri N.P. Daniel Aged About 55 Years R/o Vivekanand Nagar Phase 2, Beside Sita Devi Petrol Pump Mopka 774/11 Bilaspur Chhattisgarh- 495006 Mob. 9406213495.

¶8

Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI DN: cn=AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ou=HIGH COURT, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN

¶9

2 - Shri Aashirwad Bhagel S/o Shashi Bhagel Aged About 42 Years R/o 05 Ambedkar Mangal, Bhagwan Ke Samne, Mini Basti Jarha Bhata, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh- 495001

¶10

3 - Shri G. S. Suhas S/o T. G. Sudhan Raj Aged About 34 Years R/o A1 - 607, Gwalani Pride Shubham Vihar Sarkanda, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh- 495001

¶11

... Applicant.

¶12

Versus

¶13

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Represented By Its Public Prosecutor Police Station Civil Line District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶14

2 - Smt. Prabha Tiwari W/o Shri Mukesh Tiwari Aged About 42 Years R/o Tikrapara Yashoda Dairy Mannu Chowk Police Station City Kotwali Bilaspur

¶15

... Respondent(s)

¶16

(cause title downloaded from CIS Periphery)

¶17

For Appellants	: Mr.	Mohan Raj, Advocate.
For State	: Mr.	Ashutosh Shukla, Panel Lawyer.

¶18

(Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)

¶19

Order on Board

¶20

21/09/2026

¶21

This case is listed on default.

¶22

¶23

At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this revision petition with liberty to file appropriate petition in accordance with law.

¶24

Learned State counsel has no objection.

¶25

On due consideration, prayer is granted.

¶26

Accordingly, this Revision is disposed of as withdrawn reserving the liberty as prayed for.

¶27

Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

¶28

Sd/(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge

¶29

Ajay

Shri. Jijoy Daniel v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Jijoy Daniel v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases