Disposed¶24

Smt. Radhabai @ Omeshwari Banjare v. Lakhanlal Banjare

Chhattisgarh HC8 Apr 2026CRMP/989/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; CRMP No. 989 of 2026; restoration of criminal miscellaneous petition; dismissal for want of prosecution; non-appearance of counsel; cause shown; CRMP No. 2762/2024 restored to original number; Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal, J.; 09/04/2026; petitioners Smt. Radhabai @ Omeshwari Banjare and Minor Nikhil Banjare; respondents Lakhanlal Banjare and Smt. Preeti Banjare; counsel Udho Ram Koshaley; respondents not noticed.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for restoration of the criminal miscellaneous petition allowed; CRMP No. 2762/2024 restored to its original number. ¶24

Smt. Radhabai @ Omeshwari Banjare Vs Lakhanlal Banjare — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

2026:CGHC:16278

¶3

Digitally signed bySOURABH SOURABH PATEL PATEL Date:2026.04.09 17:25:20 +0530

¶4

NAFR

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 989 of 2026

¶6

1 - Smt. Radhabai @ Omeshwari Banjare W/o Lakhanlal Banjare, Aged About 45 Years, Occupation Housewife R/o Village Chharra At Present R/o Village Reda, Tahsil Sarangarh District- Bilaigarh (C.G.).

¶7

2 - Minor Nikhil Banjare S/o Lakhan Lal Banjare, Aged About 12 Years, Minor Applicant No. 3 Through Legal Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Radhabai @ Omeshwari Banjare, R/o Village Chharra At Present R/o Village Reda, Tahsil Sarangarh District- Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.).

¶8

... Petitioners

¶9

versus

¶10

1 - Lakhanlal Banjare S/o Late Shersingh Banjare, Aged About 48 Years, Caste Satnami Occupation Cultivator And Servant Of Secl R/o Village Chharra P.S. And Tahsil Sarangarh District- SarangarhBilaigarh (C.G.).

¶11

2 - Smt. Preeti Banjare W/o Paritosh Mahesh, Aged About 23 Years, D/o Lakhan Lal Banjare Occupation Housewife R/o Village Reda Tahsil Sarangarh District- Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.).

¶12

... Respondent

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr. Udho Ram Koshaley, Advocate For Respondents : Not noticed.

¶14

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

¶15

Order on Board

¶16

09/04/2026

¶17

1. Heard on admission.

¶18

2. Admit.

¶19

3. Vide order dated 19.03.2026 of this Court, despite repeated calls, no one appeared on behalf of the Petitioner, therefore, this Court has dismissed CRMP No. 2762/2024 for want of prosecution.

¶20

¶21

4. Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that on 19.03.2026, he was engaged in another Court, therefore, he was not present when the matter has been called.

¶22

5. Taking into consideration the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner and cause shown in the application, I am inclined to restore CRMP No. 2762/2024.

¶23

6. Prayer for restoration of the criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and CRMP No. 2762/2024 is restored to its original number.

¶24

7. Accordingly, the CRMP is disposed of.

¶25

Sd/(Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge

¶26

Sourabh P.

Smt. Radhabai @ Omeshwari Banjare v. Lakhanlal Banjare

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Radhabai @ Omeshwari Banjare v. Lakhanlal Banjare

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abc Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Javed Markandey Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ailes Yadav @ Bhukharu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sawan Puli Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Hadibandhu Mahanandiya Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Deepak Kujur Vs State Of Chhattisgarh