Anil Badi v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC6 Apr 2026CRA/88/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur — CRA No. 88 of 2008, Anil Badi v. State of Chhattisgarh; order-sheet dated 07/04/2026 (neutral citation 2026:CGHC:15893); appellant reported absconding on S.H.O. Sitapur (Dist. Surguja) report pursuant to non-bailable warrant; Mr. B.L. Dembra, Advocate, appointed from High Court Legal Services Committee panel for the appellant with direction to the Secretary, HCLSC Bilaspur, to issue appointment letter; Mr. Himanshu Yadu, P.L., for the State; matter heard finally by consent; coram Rajani Dubey, Judge; judgment dictated separately — merits and final outcome not contained in the supplied text.

What the court decided

Anil Badi Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 / 2

¶2

2026:CGHC:15893

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶4

CRA No. 88 of 2008

¶5

ANIL BADI versus STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

¶6

Order Sheet

¶7

07/04/2026	None for the appellant. Mr. Himanshu Yadu, P.L. for the State. Pursuant to the non-bailable warrant, a report has been sent by the S.H.O., Sitapur, District Surguja (C.G.) informing this Court that the appellant does not reside at the given address and reported to be absconding due to fear of arrest. Considering the pendency of the appeal, Mr. B.L. Dembra, Advocate, present in the Court, who is also in the panel list of High Court Legal Services Committee, is appointed to represent the appellant in the case. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services
	Committee, Bilaspur, is directed to issue

07/04/2026

None for the appellant.
Mr. Himanshu Yadu, P.L. for the State.
Pursuant to the non-bailable warrant, a report has
been sent by the S.H.O., Sitapur, District Surguja (C.G.)
informing this Court that the appellant does not reside
at the given address and reported to be absconding
due to fear of arrest.
Considering the pendency of the appeal, Mr. B.L.
Dembra, Advocate, present in the Court, who is also in
the panel list of High Court Legal Services Committee,
is appointed to represent the appellant in the case.
The Secretary, High Court Legal Services

Committee, Bilaspur, is directed to issue

¶8

2 / 2

¶9

authorization/appointment letter in favour of Mr. B.L. Dembra, Advocate, to represent the appellant in this case. With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finally. Judgment dictated separately, signed and dated. Sd/(Rajani Dubey) Judge pekde Digitally signed by VIJAY BHARATRAO PEKDE Date: 2026.04.13 11:57:27 +0530

Anil Badi v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Anil Badi v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Kumar Vs Lalit Chandrakar

Harishankar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Tamin Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rakesh Rai Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Deenu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Vijay Kumar Chauhan and Anr. Vs State of Chhattisgarh