291/23, measuring 0.200 hectares. The plaintiff and defendants No. 3 to 6 had executed a power of attorney on 05.06.2023 in favor of defendant No. 2, empowering them to sell or transfer the property. This general power of attorney was duly registered on 21.07.2023 at the Sub-Registrar Office, Patan. On 03.08.2023, defendant No. 2, acting under the power of attorney, executed a sale deed in favor of defendant No. 1, Smt. Bhumika Chandrakar. The plaintiff claims that the sale deed was executed fraudulently as the consideration amount of Rs. 64,04,000/- was never received by them, which was a necessary condition under the power of attorney. Therefore, the plaintiff seeks the cancellation of the sale deed, declaring it illegal and void. The plaintiff paid a court fee of Rs. 500 for the declaration and Rs. 500 for the permanent injunction. In response, the applicants filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC, contending that the plaintiff failed to pay the correct court fee based on the sale deed's value of Rs. 64,04,000/-, paying only Rs. 2500 instead. They argued that the plaintiff, being the seller in the sale deed, should pay the court fee according to the sale deed value, and the case is not maintainable due to insufficient court fees. The applicants also claimed that the sale deed, executed under the valid power of attorney, raised questions about the cause of action for the suit, which was not addressed in the plaint. Additionally, they contended that the suit is barred under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act. The defendant No. 1, in reply, denied the
