Dismissed¶26

Subhadra Devi v. Jyotsna Kalihari

Chhattisgarh HC23 Jun 2026CONT/793/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Short procedural order of the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur dated 24/06/2026 in CONT No. 793 of 2026 (Subhadra Devi, Shiv Kumar Sai, Suresh Kumar Sai, Ku. Munika Bai and Ku. Madhurika Bai v. Jyotsna Kalihari, Tahsildar Farsabahar, Kamla, Kaushaladhish and Jayanand Sai), decided by Justice Bibhu Datta Guru. Counsel Mr. Ajeet Kumar Yadav sought withdrawal of the petition as defective; the Court dismissed it as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh. Of value only for procedural precedent on withdrawal-with-liberty; contains no ruling on contempt law or underlying dispute.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh ¶26

Subhadra Devi Vs Jyotsna Kalihari — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:25814

NAFR

SOURABH BHILWAR

Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2026.06.24 17:28:51 +0530

¶6

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶7

CONT No. 793 of 2026

¶8

1 - Subhadra Devi W/o Awadhesh Sai Aged About 51 Years R/o Village Kandaibahar Tahsil Farsabahar, District Jashpur At Present R/o Village Badakata, Kunkuri, Tahsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur (C.G.)

¶9

2 - Shiv Kumar Sai S/o Awadhesh Sai Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Kandaibahar Tahsil Farsabahar, District Jashpur At Present R/o Village Badakata, Kunkuri, Tahsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur (C.G.)

¶10

3 - Suresh Kumar Sai S/o Awadhesh Sai Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Kandaibahar Tahsil Farsabahar, District Jashpur At Present R/o Village Badakata, Kunkuri, Tahsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur (C.G.)

¶11

4 - Ku. Munika Bai D/o Awadhesh Sai Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Kandaibahar Tahsil Farsabahar, District Jashpur At Present R/o Village Badakata, Kunkuri, Tahsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur (C.G.)

¶12

5 - Ku. Madhurika Bai D/o Awadhesh Sai Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Kandaibahar Tahsil Farsabahar, District Jashpur At Present R/o Village Badakata, Kunkuri, Tahsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur (C.G.)

¶13

... Petitioner(s)

¶14

versus

¶15

1 - Jyotsna Kalihari Tahsildar Farsabahar District- Jashpur (C.G.)

¶16

¶17

2 - Kamla W/o Rameshwar Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Kandaibahar Tahsil Farsabahar, District Jashpur (C.G.)

¶18

3 - Kaushaladhish S/o Rameshwar Sai Aged About 18 Years R/o Village Kandaibahar Tahsil Farsabahar, District Jashpur (C.G.)

¶19

4 - Jayanand Sai S/o Dshmat Sai Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Kandaibahar Tahsil Farsabahar, District Jashpur (C.G.)

¶20

... Respondents

¶21

(Cause title is taken from Case Information System)

¶22

For Petitioners : Mr. Ajeet Kumar Yadav, Advocate

¶23

(HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board

¶24

24/06/2026

¶25

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh, as the present petition is defective one.

¶26

In view of the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant Contempt Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.

¶27

Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE

¶28

$. Bhilwar

Subhadra Devi v. Jyotsna Kalihari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subhadra Devi v. Jyotsna Kalihari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shivpal Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sambhu Kumar Ojha Vs South Eastern Coalfield Limited

Savita Dewangan Vs Rituraj Raghuvanshi

Nandram Navrang Vs Shri Kundan Singh

Arjun Lal Mehar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ajay Kumar Bajpai Vs Himshikhar Gupta Secretary