Suresh Atlani v. Surendra Kumar Goyal
Case brief
What is this about?
This order appoints Mr. Justice Gulam Minhajuddin as the sole arbitrator after the designated arbitrators named in the agreement's clause 16 failed to respond, upon the mutual consent of both parties.
What did the court decide?
Appointment of Mr. Justice Gulam Minhajuddin as the sole arbitrator to arbitrate the dispute between the parties.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CGHC010112512026
2026:CGHC:39905
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ARBR No. 17 of 2026
1 - Suresh Atlani S/o Late Shri Golaram Atlani Aged About 67 Years Ashoka Millenium Ring Road No.1, District Tehsil Raipur, Chhattisgarh492001, Chhattisgarh
2 - Abhishek Atlani S/o Shri Suresh Atlani Aged About 40 Years Partner At M/s Geekay Construction Company, Ashoka Millenium Ring Road No.1, District Tehsil Raipur, Chhattisgarh- 492001
... Petitioners
versus
ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA
1 - Surendra Kumar Goyal S/o Lt Shri Dhanpal Goyal Aged About 67 Years B-2, Pushpak Apartment, Chotapara, District Tehsil Raipur, Chhattisgarh- 492001
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should appoint a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 when the designated arbitrators in the agreement failed to respond.
Whether the parties consent to the appointment of a retired High Court Judge as the sole arbitrator is recorded and accepted.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Suresh Atlani
- applicant
Abhishek Atlani
- respondent
Surendra Kumar Goyal
- respondent
Rekha Goyal
- respondent
Avesh Goyal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- ARBR/17/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court